Claim · model-written summary
T6 had the least favorable cost-benefit ratio, 1:1.41–1:1.58.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume1 - Outcome
- cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- least favorablee0
- Value
- 1:1.41–1:1.58e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T6 showed the least favorable cost-benefit ratio (1:1.41–1:1.58)”
e1“potato cultivar, Kufri Jyoti”
Title
Evaluation of Insecticidal Treatment Schedules for Managing Soil Pests and Enhancing Potato Yield
Biplab Kahar; Palash Mondal; Aparajita Nandi; et al. UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 2025. doi:10.56557/upjoz/2025/v46i195278
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Observation Untreated potato had the highest shoot damage, 10.86–11.26%.
- Intervention effect T1 shoot damage was 5.86–5.89%.
- Intervention effect T3 shoot damage was 6.16-6.48%.
- Intervention effect T2 shoot damage was 6.88–6.98%.
- Intervention effect T5 shoot damage was 7.37–7.68%.
- Intervention effect T6 shoot damage was 8.24–8.86%.
- Intervention effect T4 shoot damage was 8.66–9.37%.
- Intervention effect T2 had minimal tuber damage, 13.25–15.36%.
- Observation Untreated control tuber damage peaked at 34.19–43.40%.
- Observation Untreated potato had the lowest marketable tuber yield, 12.18–13.49 t/ha.
- Intervention effect T2 gave highest marketable tuber yield, 27.81–28.38 t/ha.
- Intervention effect T1 produced 26.21–26.72 t/ha marketable yield.
- Observation T2 had the most favorable cost-benefit ratio, 1:2.55–1:2.57.
- Recommendation The authors found T1 and T2 the most efficient schedules for yield and infestation.