Abstract
The present investigation was conducted during 2024-25 at Agronomy Research Farm, School of Agricultural Sciences, Jaipur National University, Jaipur, Rajasthan to evaluate the “Effect of Different Sources and Levels of Zinc on Growth Attributes and phenology of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The experiment consists of ten treatments viz., T1: Control (No zinc or fertilizer), T2: RDF of 120:60 N:P₂O₅ kg ha⁻¹, T3: RDF + soil application of ZnSO₄ at 15 kg ha⁻¹, T4: RDF + soil application of ZnSO₄ at 30 kg ha⁻¹, T5: RDF + soil application of Zn-EDTA at 1.5 kg ha⁻¹, T6: RDF + soil application of Zn-EDTA at 3.0 kg ha⁻¹, T7: RDF + foliar ZnSO₄ at 0.5% at CRI, tillering and milking stage, T8: RDF + foliar ZnSO₄ at 1.0% at CRI, tillering and milking stage, T9: RDF + foliar Zn-EDTA at 0.25% at CRI, tillering and milking stage and T10: RDF + foliar Zn-EDTA at 0.5% at CRI, tillering and milking stage. The present study revealed that significantly higher plant height, number of tillers per plant and dry matter accumulation with the soil application of ZnSO₄ at 30 kg ha⁻¹ but it was at par with RDF + Soil application of Zn EDTA @ 3.0 kg ha-1 and RDF + Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 15 kg ha-1 compared to control and RDF alone. Whereas, Zinc Sources and different levels did not exhibit a significant influence on plant stand, days required to 50% flowering and maturity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Soil ZnSO₄ at 30 kg ha⁻¹ significantly increased wheat height, tiller number and dry matter versus control and RDF alone; it was at par with two other zinc treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- soil application of ZnSO₄ at 30 kg ha⁻¹e0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of tillers per plant and dry matter accumulatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- at par with RDF + Soil application of Zn EDTA @ 3.0 kg ha-1 and RDF + Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 15 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- control and RDF alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher plant height, number of tillers per plant and dry matter accumulation with the soil application of ZnSO₄ at 30 kg ha⁻¹ but it was at par with RDF + Soil application of Zn EDTA @ 3.0 kg ha-1 and RDF + Soil application of ZnSO4 @ 15 kg ha-1 compared to control and RDF alone.”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sources and levels did not significantly affect wheat plant stand or time to flowering and maturity.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zinc Sources and different levelse0
- Outcome
- plant stand, days required to 50% flowering and maturitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Zinc Sources and different levels did not exhibit a significant influence on plant stand, days required to 50% flowering and maturity.”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
196 papers more in this group
See all 200 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.