Paper · 2025 · Weed Technology

Use of Tetflupyrolimet to Manage Herbicide-resistant Echinochloa crus-galli Biotypes in Arkansas Rice

Mason C. Castner; Jason K. Norsworthy; Trenton L. Roberts; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract With the introduction of tetflupyrolimet as the first herbicide with a novel site of action in the last three decades, screening for herbicide resistance before commercialization has become integral to ensure successful applications. In the mid-southern United States, tetflupyrolimet is anticipated to be used as a preemergence (PRE) herbicide for barnyardgrass control but does exhibit postemergence (POST) herbicidal activity. In 2020, 45 Echinochloa crus-galli (barnyardgrass) accessions were collected from rice-producing areas in Arkansas and were screened in the greenhouse to tetflupyrolimet at 134 g ai ha -1 PRE and POST at the 2- to 3-leaf growth stage on a silt loam soil. A field experiment was conducted where tetflupyrolimet was applied alone at 134 g ai ha -1 or with clomazone at 336 g ai ha -1 , to a susceptible barnyardgrass standard and four other accessions with confirmed resistance to florpyrauxifen-benzyl, imazethapyr, propanil, and quinclorac at the spiking, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-leaf stages. For the PRE screening, the percent visible control ranged from 88% to 99%, with some accessions differing in sensitivity to tetflupyrolimet. Percent mortality ranged from 47% to 90% at the PRE timing. Visible control and mortality ranged from 63% to 88% and 7% to 65%, respectively, from a POST application, suggesting there is differential sensitivity and that foliar applications may not be as effective as soil applications. In the field experiment, barnyardgrass accession did not influence POST biomass production and was impacted more by the growth stage at application, although the difference was frequently numerical. In general, applying tetflupyrolimet alone or with clomazone to ≥3 leaf grass compromised performance. Tetflupyrolimet will be better optimized as a soil-applied herbicide in mid-southern U.S. rice culture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE tetflupyrolimet gave 88% to 99% visible control, with accession differences.

Treatment
tetflupyrolimete0
Interactor
accessionse0weed
Outcome
percent visible controle0
Value
88% to 99%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the PRE screening, the percent visible control ranged from 88% to 99%, with some accessions differing in sensitivity to tetflupyrolimet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE mortality ranged from 47% to 90%.

Treatment
PRE timinge0
Interactor
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallit0weed
Outcome
Percent mortalitye0
Value
47% to 90%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percent mortality ranged from 47% to 90% at the PRE timing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Echinochloa crus-galli Biotypes in Arkansas Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST visible control ranged from 63% to 88%.

Treatment
POST applicatione0
Interactor
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallit0weed
Outcome
Visible controle0
Value
63% to 88%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visible control and mortality ranged from 63% to 88% and 7% to 65%, respectively, from a POST application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Echinochloa crus-galli Biotypes in Arkansas Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST mortality ranged from 7% to 65%.

Treatment
POST applicatione0
Interactor
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallit0weed
Outcome
mortalitye0
Value
7% to 65%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visible control and mortality ranged from 63% to 88% and 7% to 65%, respectively, from a POST application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Echinochloa crus-galli Biotypes in Arkansas Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barnyardgrass accession did not influence POST biomass production.

Material
barnyardgrass accessione0
Interactor
barnyardgrassEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
POST biomass productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barnyardgrass accession did not influence POST biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application at three or more leaf stage compromised performance.

Organ / stage
≥3 leafe0
Treatment
tetflupyrolimet alone or with clomazonee0
Interactor
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallit0weed
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
compromisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying tetflupyrolimet alone or with clomazone to ≥3 leaf grass compromised performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Echinochloa crus-galli Biotypes in Arkansas Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend soil application of tetflupyrolimet in rice.

Outcome
soil-applied herbicidee0
Setting
mid-southern U.S.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tetflupyrolimet will be better optimized as a soil-applied herbicide in mid-southern U.S. rice culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1859 · show in text ↑

clomazone · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tetflupyrolimet · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · Echinochloa crus-galli · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.