Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Use of organic amendments for sustainable management of root rot disease of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) caused by Sclerotium rolfsii

Dipankar Mandal; Rini Pal; Sanjukta Mohapatra; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The utilization of organic amendments has been considered as the best nonchemical management strategy for controlling the soil borne pathogens and hence can act as a potential tool to manage different soil borne diseases of tomato. Keeping this in view, several organic amendments were used against sclerotium root rot disease of tomato which is soil borne in nature. Effects of these amendments on the plant growth parameters as well as on the soil mycoflora were also studied. The experimental result revealed that among different organic amendments the maximum plant height and leaf number/plant were observed in neem cake treated plot representing the values 54.61 cm and 122.08 per plant respectively at 50 days after transplanting, against 40.86 cm and 71.03 per plant in case of control plots. The least sclerotium root rot disease incidence (14.75%) and maximum fruit yield (266.33q ha −1 ) were also observed in neem cake treated plot (T 1 ). Quantitative changes in the rhizosphere fungal population were also noticed due to the application of organic amendments in soil. It was observed that the fungal population peaked at 60 DAT and declined thereafter irrespective of the treatment. Minimum population was recorded in neem cake treated plot (T 1 ) and maximum population was recorded in farmyard manure treated plot (T 5 ) at all stages of plant growth except initial population (before transplanting). Soil beneficial fungi like Penicillium chrysogenum , Trichoderma asperellum were also observed in neem cake treated plot (T 1 ) which can play an important role in sustainable management of the disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake produced the maximum tomato plant height of 54.61 cm at 50 days after transplanting, versus 40.86 cm in controls.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
54.61 cme0
Qualifier
40.86 cme0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum plant height and leaf number/plant were observed in neem cake treated plot representing the values 54.61 cm and 122.08 per plant respectively at 50 days after transplanting, against 40.86 cm and 71.03 per plant in case of control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake produced the maximum tomato leaf number of 122.08 per plant at 50 days after transplanting, versus 71.03 in controls.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Outcome
leaf number/plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
122.08 per plante0
Qualifier
71.03 per plante0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum plant height and leaf number/plant were observed in neem cake treated plot representing the values 54.61 cm and 122.08 per plant respectively at 50 days after transplanting, against 40.86 cm and 71.03 per plant in case of control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake produced the least tomato root rot incidence, 14.75%.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiit0pathogen
Outcome
sclerotium root rot disease incidencee0
Direction
leaste0
Value
14.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The least sclerotium root rot disease incidence (14.75%) and maximum fruit yield (266.33q ha −1 ) were also observed in neem cake treated plot (T 1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) caused by Sclerotium rolfsii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake produced the maximum tomato fruit yield, 266.33q ha −1.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
266.33q ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The least sclerotium root rot disease incidence (14.75%) and maximum fruit yield (266.33q ha −1 ) were also observed in neem cake treated plot (T 1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere fungal populations peaked at 60 DAT.

Organ / stage
rhizospheree2
Outcome
fungal populatione0
Direction
peakede0
Value
60 DATe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungal population peaked at 60 DAT and declined thereafter irrespective of the treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
e2

“rhizosphere fungal population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1009 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere fungal populations declined after 60 DAT.

Organ / stage
rhizospheree2
Outcome
fungal populatione0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
thereaftere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungal population peaked at 60 DAT and declined thereafter irrespective of the treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1196 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
e2

“rhizosphere fungal population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal population was lowest with neem cake across growth stages except before transplanting.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
Minimume0
Qualifier
except initial population (before transplanting)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum population was recorded in neem cake treated plot (T 1 ) and maximum population was recorded in farmyard manure treated plot (T 5 ) at all stages of plant growth except initial population (before transplanting).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1416 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal population was highest with farmyard manure across growth stages except before transplanting.

Treatment
farmyard manuree0
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
except initial population (before transplanting)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum population was recorded in neem cake treated plot (T 1 ) and maximum population was recorded in farmyard manure treated plot (T 5 ) at all stages of plant growth except initial population (before transplanting).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1416 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium chrysogenum was observed in the neem cake plot.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Interactor
Penicillium chrysogenumPenicillium chrysogenume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Penicillium chrysogenume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium chrysogenum
Penicillium chrysogenum · InteractorCrulina 98 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil beneficial fungi like Penicillium chrysogenum , Trichoderma asperellum were also observed in neem cake treated plot (T 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma asperellum was observed in the neem cake plot.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Interactor
Trichoderma asperellumTrichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Trichoderma asperellume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · InteractorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil beneficial fungi like Penicillium chrysogenum , Trichoderma asperellum were also observed in neem cake treated plot (T 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1544 · show in text ↑
e1

“root rot disease of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–336 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 126 positive, 12 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

134 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

botanical · Agroathelia rolfsii · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.