Paper · 2004 · Journal of Pest Control and Environmental Sciences

Improving herbicidal performance by mixing with oils in wheat

Farid S. Sabra; Amel Hossien

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out in two successive winter season, 2002 and 2003 at Research Experimental Station of Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University in wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sakha 8), using two compounds from sulfonylurea herbicides, tribenuron-methyl (Granstar) and (thifensulfuron-methyl + metsulfuron) (Harmony) at 0.5, 0.75 or the recommended field rate either alone or mixed with mineral or vegetable oils. The results revealed that, the tank mix of vegetable oil at (0.5%) with tribenuron-methyl (0.75 fold of field rate) was reduced the cost per feddan up to the quarter of the cost. Also, thifensulfuron-methyl + metsulfuron (Harmony) had the same trend when mixed with 1% mineral oil. At the applied doses, a reduction of costs per feddan ranged from 10 to 15 LE was happened.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetable oil with tribenuron-methyl at 0.75 of field rate reduced cost per feddan to a quarter.

Treatment
tank mix of vegetable oil at (0.5%) with tribenuron-methyl (0.75 fold of field rate)e0
Outcome
cost per feddane0
Direction
reducede0
Value
the quarter of the coste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tank mix of vegetable oil at (0.5%) with tribenuron-methyl (0.75 fold of field rate) was reduced the cost per feddan up to the quarter of the cost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harmony mixed with 1% mineral oil showed the same cost reduction trend.

Treatment
thifensulfuron-methyl + metsulfuron (Harmony)e0
Outcome
same trende0
Qualifier
mixed with 1% mineral oile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thifensulfuron-methyl + metsulfuron (Harmony) had the same trend when mixed with 1% mineral oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the applied doses, cost per feddan fell by 10 to 15 LE.

Outcome
costs per feddane0
Direction
reductione0
Value
10 to 15 LEe0
Qualifier
At the applied dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the applied doses, a reduction of costs per feddan ranged from 10 to 15 LE was happened.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 · show in text ↑

tribenuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.