Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Wild Mustard (Sinapis arvensis) Competition and Control in Rain-Fed Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Meisam Zargar; Nyasha John Kavhiza; Maryam Bayat; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) is a weed that frequently infests spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) fields in Moscow province, Russia. It is an annual broad leaf weed, which is indigenous throughout most parts of the globe and one of the most competitive weeds of spring cereal crops. In southern Russia it is emerging as an important crop competitor. Field trials focusing on herbicide timing and efficacy on wild mustard control and spring wheat yield in the Moscow region, Kashira and Baribino districts. A PRE glyphosate application to wheat regardless of fall or spring application timing favorably suppressed wild mustard in 2018. Weeds were not controlled in 2019 with the earliest application timings of glyphosate because weeds emerged late. In comparing fall and spring application timings, the formulated combination of (iodosulfuron/mesosulfuron/antidote mefenpyr-diethyl) at both field rates provided 80% weed control for all application timings and locations, and also resulting in the greatest spring wheat grain yield. Overall, herbicide treatments performed greater when they were in the fall than during the spring. Based on POST herbicide application, tribenuron-methyl provided the greatest wild mustard suppression (75%) and also caused the highest reduction in wild mustard biomass (3.3 g), stem number (6), seed number (880) and germination percentage (33%). When wild mustard was approximately 32 weeds/m2 causedtotal wheat yield loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRE glyphosate suppressed wild mustard in wheat in 2018 for both fall and spring timing.

Treatment
PRE glyphosate applicatione0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
wild mustarde0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
2018e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A PRE glyphosate application to wheat regardless of fall or spring application timing favorably suppressed wild mustard in 2018.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earliest glyphosate timings did not control weeds in 2019 because weeds emerged late.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
earliest application timings of glyphosatee0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
Weedse0
Direction
not controllede0
Qualifier
weeds emerged latee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds were not controlled in 2019 with the earliest application timings of glyphosate because weeds emerged late.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The iodosulfuron/mesosulfuron/mefenpyr-diethyl formulation provided 80% weed control at both rates and all timings and locations.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
formulated combination of (iodosulfuron/mesosulfuron/antidote mefenpyr-diethyl)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
providede0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
both field ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the formulated combination of (iodosulfuron/mesosulfuron/antidote mefenpyr-diethyl) at both field rates provided 80% weed control for all application timings and locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same formulation gave the greatest spring wheat grain yield.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
formulated combination of (iodosulfuron/mesosulfuron/antidote mefenpyr-diethyl)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
spring wheat grain yielde0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the formulated combination of (iodosulfuron/mesosulfuron/antidote mefenpyr-diethyl) at both field rates provided 80% weed control for all application timings and locations, and also resulting in the greatest spring wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall herbicide treatments performed better than spring treatments.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
performed greatere0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
springe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide treatments performed greater when they were in the fall than during the spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST tribenuron-methyl gave the greatest wild mustard suppression at 75%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
wild mustard suppressione0
Direction
greateste0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on POST herbicide application, tribenuron-methyl provided the greatest wild mustard suppression (75%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST tribenuron-methyl gave the highest reduction in wild mustard biomass, 3.3 g.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
wild mustard biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
3.3 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl provided the greatest wild mustard suppression (75%) and also caused the highest reduction in wild mustard biomass (3.3 g), stem number (6), seed number (880) and germination percentage (33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST tribenuron-methyl gave the highest reduction in wild mustard stem number, 6.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
stem numbere0
Direction
reductione0
Value
6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl provided the greatest wild mustard suppression (75%) and also caused the highest reduction in wild mustard biomass (3.3 g), stem number (6), seed number (880) and germination percentage (33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST tribenuron-methyl gave the highest reduction in wild mustard seed number, 880.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
seed numbere0
Direction
reductione0
Value
880e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl provided the greatest wild mustard suppression (75%) and also caused the highest reduction in wild mustard biomass (3.3 g), stem number (6), seed number (880) and germination percentage (33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST tribenuron-methyl gave the highest reduction in wild mustard germination percentage, 33%.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
germination percentagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl provided the greatest wild mustard suppression (75%) and also caused the highest reduction in wild mustard biomass (3.3 g), stem number (6), seed number (880) and germination percentage (33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Approximately 32 wild mustard plants per square meter caused total wheat yield loss.

Interactor
wild mustarde0weed
Outcome
wheat yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
approximately 32 weeds/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When wild mustard was approximately 32 weeds/m2 causedtotal wheat yield loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1464 · show in text ↑

tribenuron methyl · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tribenuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mefenpyr-diethyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tribenuron methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.