Paper · 2013 · Weed Technology

Japanese Bindweed (Calystegia hederacea) Abundance and Response to Winter Wheat Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Fertilization in the North China Plain

Alexander Menegat; Ortrud Jäck; Jinwei Zhang; et al.

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Japanese bindweed was found to be one of the most abundant and most difficult-to-control weed species during a 2-yr weed survey in more than 100 winter wheat fields in the North China Plain region. Multivariate data analysis showed that Japanese bindweed is most abundant at sites with comparative low nitrogen (N) fertilization intensities and low crop densities. To gain deeper insights into the biology of Japanese bindweed under various N fertilization intensities, winter wheat seeding rates, herbicide treatments, and their interactions, a 2-yr field experiment was performed. In nonfertilized plots, a herbicide efficacy (based on density reduction) of 22% for 2,4-D, and of 25% for tribenuron-methyl was found. The maximum herbicide efficacy in N min -fertilized plots (target N value based on expected crop yield minus soil mineral nitrogen content, ) was 32% for 2,4-D and 34% for tribenuron-methyl. In plots fertilized according to the farmer's practices, a maximum herbicide efficacy of 72% for 2,4-D and of 64% for tribenuron-methyl could be observed. Furthermore, medium and high seeding rates improved the herbicide efficacy by at least 39% for tribenuron-methyl and 44% for 2,4-D compared to the low seeding rate. Winter wheat yield was not significantly affected by seeding rate itself, whereas at low and medium seeding rates, N min fertilization was decreasing winter wheat yield significantly compared to the farmer's usual fertilization practice. At the highest seeding rate, N min fertilization resulted in equal yields compared to the farmer's practices of fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Japanese bindweed was among the most abundant and difficult weeds in wheat fields.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede0weed
Outcome
Japanese bindweed was found to be one of the most abundant and most difficult-to-control weed speciese0
Setting
North China Plain regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Japanese bindweed was found to be one of the most abundant and most difficult-to-control weed species during a 2-yr weed survey in more than 100 winter wheat fields in the North China Plain region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–196 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bindweed was most abundant at lower nitrogen fertilization and crop densities.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
low nitrogen (N) fertilization intensitiese0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede0weed
Outcome
Japanese bindweed is most abundante0
Direction
most abundante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Japanese bindweed is most abundant at sites with comparative low nitrogen (N) fertilization intensities and low crop densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–363 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unfertilized plots, 2,4-D reduced bindweed density by 22%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede1weed
Outcome
density reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In nonfertilized plots, a herbicide efficacy (based on density reduction) of 22% for 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–673 · show in text ↑
e1

“Japanese bindweed was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In unfertilized plots, tribenuron-methyl reduced bindweed density by 25%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede1weed
Outcome
density reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In nonfertilized plots, a herbicide efficacy (based on density reduction) of 22% for 2,4-D, and of 25% for tribenuron-methyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–707 · show in text ↑
e1

“Japanese bindweed was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N min fertilization, 2,4-D reached 32% weed control efficacy.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede1weed
Outcome
herbicide efficacye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
32%e0
Qualifier
N min -fertilized plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum herbicide efficacy in N min -fertilized plots (target N value based on expected crop yield minus soil mineral nitrogen content, ) was 32% for 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–878 · show in text ↑
e1

“Japanese bindweed was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N min fertilization, tribenuron-methyl reached 34% weed control efficacy.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede1weed
Outcome
herbicide efficacye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
34%e0
Qualifier
N min -fertilized plotse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum herbicide efficacy in N min -fertilized plots (target N value based on expected crop yield minus soil mineral nitrogen content, ) was 32% for 2,4-D and 34% for tribenuron-methyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–908 · show in text ↑
e1

“Japanese bindweed was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under farmer fertilization, 2,4-D reached 72% efficacy.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede1weed
Outcome
herbicide efficacye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
72%e0
Qualifier
fertilized according to the farmer's practicese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In plots fertilized according to the farmer's practices, a maximum herbicide efficacy of 72% for 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“Japanese bindweed was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under farmer fertilization, tribenuron-methyl reached 64% efficacy.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
tribenuron-methyle0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede1weed
Outcome
herbicide efficacye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
64%e0
Qualifier
fertilized according to the farmer's practicese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In plots fertilized according to the farmer's practices, a maximum herbicide efficacy of 72% for 2,4-D and of 64% for tribenuron-methyl could be observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“Japanese bindweed was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium and high seeding rates improved tribenuron-methyl efficacy by at least 39%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
medium and high seeding ratese0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede1weed
Outcome
herbicide efficacye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
at least 39%e0
Qualifier
tribenuron-methyle0
Comparator
low seeding ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium and high seeding rates improved the herbicide efficacy by at least 39% for tribenuron-methyl and 44% for 2,4-D compared to the low seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1228 · show in text ↑
e1

“Japanese bindweed was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium and high seeding rates improved 2,4-D efficacy by at least 44%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
medium and high seeding ratese0
Interactor
Japanese bindweede1weed
Outcome
herbicide efficacye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
44%e0
Qualifier
2,4-De0
Comparator
low seeding ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium and high seeding rates improved the herbicide efficacy by at least 39% for tribenuron-methyl and 44% for 2,4-D compared to the low seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1228 · show in text ↑
e1

“Japanese bindweed was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e2

“winter wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–164 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate itself did not significantly affect wheat yield.

Taxon
Winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
seeding ratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat yield was not significantly affected by seeding rate itself”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At low and medium seeding rates, N min fertilization significantly decreased wheat yield compared with farmer practice.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
N min fertilizatione0
Outcome
winter wheat yielde0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
at low and medium seeding ratese0
Comparator
farmer's usual fertilization practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at low and medium seeding rates, N min fertilization was decreasing winter wheat yield significantly compared to the farmer's usual fertilization practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest seeding rate, N min fertilization produced equal wheat yield to farmer practice.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
N min fertilizatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
equale0
Qualifier
At the highest seeding ratee0
Comparator
farmer's practices of fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the highest seeding rate, N min fertilization resulted in equal yields compared to the farmer's practices of fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1593 · show in text ↑
e1

“winter wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1398 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

tribenuron methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

density · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.