Intervention effectmodel-written summary

2, 4-D Ester antagonized fenoxaprop efficacy.

A claim from Compatibility of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl with carfentrazone-ethyl metsulfuron-methyl and 2, 4-D for controlling complex weeds of wheat. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D Ester antagonized fenoxaprop efficacy.

Treatment
2, 4-D Estere0
Outcome
efficacy of fenoxaprope0
Direction
antagonistice0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–129
e0

“Metsulfuron 2, 4-D Ester and Na salt had antagonistic effect on the efficacy of fenoxaprop when applied as tank mixture with it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1570

Title

Compatibility of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl with carfentrazone-ethyl metsulfuron-methyl and 2, 4-D for controlling complex weeds of wheat.

Dharam Bir Yadav; Ashok Yadav; Samunder Singh; et al. Indian Journal of Weed Science 2009

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-78154ca3f5dd3acfb9bfd0e52b0a36279b6be3892461a82ee6a35aea8c33c33e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

ester · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

2,4-D · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.