Paper · 1989 · Tropical Pest Management

Influence of 2,4‐D and surfactant in combination with urea herbicides on the control of weeds in wheat

R. K. Malik; R. S. Panwar; V. M. Bhan; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The influence of isoproturon (1.0 kg/ha), metoxuron (1.6 kg/ha) and methabenzthiazuron (1.4 kg/ha) mixed with 2,4‐D (0.50 kg/ha) each at their 50% less dose and with surfactant (0.1 %) at their 25% less dose demonstrated that per cent control of wild oat and wild canary grass reduced when these herbicides were combined with 2,4‐D. Addition of surfactant improved the control of wild oat, wild pea, yellow sweet clover and commonvetch. Combination of urea herbicides and 2,4‐D increased the control of broad leaf weeds over urea herbicides applied alone. However, the control of broad leaf weeds was almost similar to 2,4‐D applied alone. Pre‐emergence application of urea herbicides was less effective than their post‐emergence applications. Reduced rate of isoproturon and metoxuron in combination with surfactant gave similar grain yield to that obtained at recommended doses of these herbicides applied alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining urea herbicides with 2,4‐D reduced control of wild oat and wild canary grass.

Treatment
combined with 2,4‐De0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Second interactor
wild canary grasse0weed
Outcome
per cent control of wild oat and wild canary grasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“per cent control of wild oat and wild canary grass reduced when these herbicides were combined with 2,4‐D.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surfactant improved control of four weed species.

Treatment
Addition of surfactante0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Second interactor
wild peaLathyrus oleraceus subsp. bifloruse0weed
Outcome
control of wild oat, wild pea, yellow sweet clover and commonvetche0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
yellow sweet clover and commonvetche0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lathyrus oleraceus subsp. biflorus
Lathyrus oleraceus subsp. biflorus · Second interactor · picture of the speciesRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of surfactant improved the control of wild oat, wild pea, yellow sweet clover and commonvetch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea herbicides plus 2,4‐D increased broadleaf weed control over urea herbicides alone.

Treatment
Combination of urea herbicides and 2,4‐De0
Interactor
broad leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
control of broad leaf weedse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
urea herbicides applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combination of urea herbicides and 2,4‐D increased the control of broad leaf weeds over urea herbicides applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadleaf weed control was similar to 2,4‐D alone.

Treatment
Combination of urea herbicides and 2,4‐De1
Interactor
broad leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
control of broad leaf weedse0
Direction
almost similare0
Comparator
2,4‐D applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the control of broad leaf weeds was almost similar to 2,4‐D applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combination of urea herbicides and 2,4‐D increased the control of broad leaf weeds over urea herbicides applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre‐emergence urea herbicides were less effective than post‐emergence applications.

Treatment
Pre‐emergence application of urea herbicidese0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
post‐emergence applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre‐emergence application of urea herbicides was less effective than their post‐emergence applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced isoproturon and metoxuron rates with surfactant produced similar grain yield to recommended doses.

Treatment
Reduced rate of isoproturon and metoxuron in combination with surfactante0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
recommended doses of these herbicides applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced rate of isoproturon and metoxuron in combination with surfactant gave similar grain yield to that obtained at recommended doses of these herbicides applied alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

metoxuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

surfactant · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

2,4-D · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

surfactant · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.