Paper · 2002 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of Metsulfuronmethyl Alone and in Combination with 2,4-D and Surfactant on Non-grassy Weeds and Wheat Yield

Govindra Singh; Mahendra Singh; Vinay Singh

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during winter seasons of 1996–97 and 1997–98 to assess the effect of metsulfuronmethyl (MSM) alone and in combination with 2,4-D and surfactant on non-grassy weeds and wheat yield. Results revealed that weed control efficiency of MSM at 4.0 g ha−1 applied alone was similar to MSM at 2 g ha−1 applied with surfactant. Ready mix formulation of MSM+2,4-D at 2+250 g ha−1+Surfactant had weed control efficacy similar to ready mix formulation of MSM+2,4-D at 2.0+500 g ha−1+surfactant or MSM+2,4-D at 4.0+500 g ha−1. MSM alone was relatively better than 2,4-D applied alone.There was non-phytotoxic effect of any of the treatments on wheat crop at any stage. Application of ready mix formulation of MSM applied alone or in combination with 2,4-D and surfactant, being at par among them, had significantly more grain yield compared to application of 2,4-D alone at 500 g ha−1 ethyl ester or sodium salt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSM at 4.0 g ha−1 alone had similar weed control efficiency to MSM at 2 g ha−1 with surfactant.

Treatment
MSM at 4.0 g ha−1 applied alonee0
Interactor
non-grassy Weedst0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
MSM at 2 g ha−1 applied with surfactante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control efficiency of MSM at 4.0 g ha−1 applied alone was similar to MSM at 2 g ha−1 applied with surfactant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–347 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Metsulfuronmethyl Alone and in Combination with 2,4-D and Surfactant on Non-grassy Weeds and Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSM plus 2,4-D at 2+250 g ha−1 with surfactant matched the 2.0+500 g ha−1 formulation for weed control.

Treatment
MSM+2,4-D at 2+250 g ha−1+Surfactante0
Interactor
Non-grassy Weedst0weed
Outcome
weed control efficacye0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
MSM+2,4-D at 2.0+500 g ha−1+surfactante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSM+2,4-D at 2+250 g ha−1+Surfactant had weed control efficacy similar to ready mix formulation of MSM+2,4-D at 2.0+500 g ha−1+surfactant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Metsulfuronmethyl Alone and in Combination with 2,4-D and Surfactant on Non-grassy Weeds and Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSM plus 2,4-D at 2+250 g ha−1 with surfactant matched the 4.0+500 g ha−1 formulation for weed control.

Treatment
MSM+2,4-D at 2+250 g ha−1+Surfactante0
Interactor
Non-grassy Weedst0weed
Outcome
weed control efficacye0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
MSM+2,4-D at 4.0+500 g ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSM+2,4-D at 2+250 g ha−1+Surfactant had weed control efficacy similar to ready mix formulation of MSM+2,4-D at 2.0+500 g ha−1+surfactant or MSM+2,4-D at 4.0+500 g ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Metsulfuronmethyl Alone and in Combination with 2,4-D and Surfactant on Non-grassy Weeds and Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSM alone controlled weeds relatively better than 2,4-D alone.

Treatment
MSM alonee0
Interactor
Non-grassy Weedst0weed
Outcome
relatively bettere0
Direction
relatively bettere0
Comparator
2,4-D applied alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSM alone was relatively better than 2,4-D applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Metsulfuronmethyl Alone and in Combination with 2,4-D and Surfactant on Non-grassy Weeds and Wheat Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the treatments caused phytotoxicity in wheat at any stage.

Outcome
non-phytotoxic effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-phytotoxic effect of any of the treatments on wheat crop at any stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MSM alone or with 2,4-D and surfactant gave significantly higher grain yield than 2,4-D alone.

Treatment
MSM applied alone or in combination with 2,4-D and surfactante0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
2,4-D alone at 500 g ha−1 ethyl ester or sodium salte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MSM applied alone or in combination with 2,4-D and surfactant, being at par among them, had significantly more grain yield compared to application of 2,4-D alone at 500 g ha−1 ethyl ester or sodium salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

surfactant · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    The mixture gave similar wheat grain yield to sequential application and weed-free conditions.

    Bio-efficacy of ready-mix formulation of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron for control of mixed weed flora in wheat · 2015 · compared with sequential application of clodinafop 60 g/ha and metsulfuron 4 g/ha and weed free

    No difference from an alternative

  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.