Paper · 2015 · Anhui nongye kexue

Comparison on Weeding Effects of Several Kinds of Chemical Herbicides in Wheat Field

Guo Zhan-be

9
claims
51
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] Weeding effects of several kinds of chemical herbicides in wheat field were studied to provide reference for reasonable selection and use of herbicides. [Method] Efficiency in field of several common herbicides against broadleaf weeds in wheat field was studied.[Result]The amounts of active ingredient were 10% carfentrazone-ethyl WP 30. 0 g/hm2,10% tribenuron methyl WP 22. 5 g/hm2,288 g/L Fluroxypr mepthyl EC 210. 0 g / hm2,50 g/L Florasulam SC 4. 5 g/hm2,20% halosulfuron-tribenuron methyl WP 108. 0 g/hm2,36% carfentrazone ethyl-tribenuron methyl WP 27. 0 g / hm2,55% tribenuron methyl-carfentrazone ethyl-MCPA WP 412. 5 g/hm2,5% Florasulam-carfentrazone ethyl SC. Their control effects were 88. 79%,9. 35%,61. 68%,73. 83%,55. 14%,90. 65%,93. 46% and 96. 26%,or 91. 08%,26. 49%,73. 35%,88. 54%,71. 83%,92. 18%,96. 76% and 98. 17% by fresh weigh,respectively. [Conclusion]Through comparison,the herbicides which contained carfentrazone ethyl ingredient had better control effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide 10% carfentrazone-ethyl WP 30. 0 g/hm2 controlled broadleaf weeds in wheat with control effects of 88. 79% and 91. 08% (by fresh weight, two assessments).

Treatment
10% carfentrazone-ethyl WP 30. 0 g/hm2e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse4weed
Outcome
control effectse3
Value
88. 79%e1
Qualifier
91. 08%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“10% carfentrazone-ethyl WP 30. 0 g/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–358 · show in text ↑
e1

“88. 79%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–717 · show in text ↑
e2

“91. 08%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–787 · show in text ↑
e3

“Their control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide 10% tribenuron methyl WP 22. 5 g/hm2 controlled broadleaf weeds in wheat with control effects of 9. 35% and 26. 49% (by fresh weight, two assessments).

Treatment
10% tribenuron methyl WP 22. 5 g/hm2e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse4weed
Outcome
control effectse3
Value
9. 35%e1
Qualifier
26. 49%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“10% tribenuron methyl WP 22. 5 g/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–395 · show in text ↑
e1

“9. 35%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–724 · show in text ↑
e2

“26. 49%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–795 · show in text ↑
e3

“Their control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide 288 g/L Fluroxypr mepthyl EC 210. 0 g / hm2 controlled broadleaf weeds in wheat with control effects of 61. 68% and 73. 35% (by fresh weight, two assessments).

Treatment
288 g/L Fluroxypr mepthyl EC 210. 0 g / hm2e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse4weed
Outcome
control effectse3
Value
61. 68%e1
Qualifier
73. 35%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“288 g/L Fluroxypr mepthyl EC 210. 0 g / hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–439 · show in text ↑
e1

“61. 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–732 · show in text ↑
e2

“73. 35%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–803 · show in text ↑
e3

“Their control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide 50 g/L Florasulam SC 4. 5 g/hm2 controlled broadleaf weeds in wheat with control effects of 73. 83% and 88. 54% (by fresh weight, two assessments).

Treatment
50 g/L Florasulam SC 4. 5 g/hm2e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse4weed
Outcome
control effectse3
Value
73. 83%e1
Qualifier
88. 54%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“50 g/L Florasulam SC 4. 5 g/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–471 · show in text ↑
e1

“73. 83%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–740 · show in text ↑
e2

“88. 54%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–811 · show in text ↑
e3

“Their control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide 20% halosulfuron-tribenuron methyl WP 108. 0 g/hm2 controlled broadleaf weeds in wheat with control effects of 55. 14% and 71. 83% (by fresh weight, two assessments).

Treatment
20% halosulfuron-tribenuron methyl WP 108. 0 g/hm2e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse4weed
Outcome
control effectse3
Value
55. 14%e1
Qualifier
71. 83%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“20% halosulfuron-tribenuron methyl WP 108. 0 g/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–522 · show in text ↑
e1

“55. 14%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–748 · show in text ↑
e2

“71. 83%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–819 · show in text ↑
e3

“Their control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide 36% carfentrazone ethyl-tribenuron methyl WP 27. 0 g / hm2 controlled broadleaf weeds in wheat with control effects of 90. 65% and 92. 18% (by fresh weight, two assessments).

Treatment
36% carfentrazone ethyl-tribenuron methyl WP 27. 0 g / hm2e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse4weed
Outcome
control effectse3
Value
90. 65%e1
Qualifier
92. 18%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“36% carfentrazone ethyl-tribenuron methyl WP 27. 0 g / hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“90. 65%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–756 · show in text ↑
e2

“92. 18%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–827 · show in text ↑
e3

“Their control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide 55% tribenuron methyl-carfentrazone ethyl-MCPA WP 412. 5 g/hm2 controlled broadleaf weeds in wheat with control effects of 93. 46% and 96. 76% (by fresh weight, two assessments).

Treatment
55% tribenuron methyl-carfentrazone ethyl-MCPA WP 412. 5 g/hm2e0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse4weed
Outcome
control effectse3
Value
93. 46%e1
Qualifier
96. 76%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“55% tribenuron methyl-carfentrazone ethyl-MCPA WP 412. 5 g/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–644 · show in text ↑
e1

“93. 46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–764 · show in text ↑
e2

“96. 76%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–835 · show in text ↑
e3

“Their control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide 5% Florasulam-carfentrazone ethyl SC controlled broadleaf weeds in wheat with control effects of 96. 26% and 98. 17% (by fresh weight, two assessments).

Treatment
5% Florasulam-carfentrazone ethyl SCe0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse4weed
Outcome
control effectse3
Value
96. 26%e1
Qualifier
98. 17%e2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“5% Florasulam-carfentrazone ethyl SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–681 · show in text ↑
e1

“96. 26%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–776 · show in text ↑
e2

“98. 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–847 · show in text ↑
e3

“Their control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–704 · show in text ↑
e4

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides containing carfentrazone ethyl had better weed control effects than the others compared.

Treatment
herbicides which contained carfentrazone ethyl ingrediente0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse1weed
Outcome
control effectse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“the herbicides which contained carfentrazone ethyl ingredient had better control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–996 · show in text ↑
e1

“broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–246 · show in text ↑

methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Florasulam · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carfentrazone-ethyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tribenuron · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

carfentrazone · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tribenuron methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.