Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Bio-efficacy of Chlorsulfuron, Metsulfuron Methyl and Metribuzin Alone and in Combinations for Weed Control in Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)

Rajvir Sharma; S. S. Pahuja

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Application of chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1, metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1, metribuzin at 200, 400 g ha−1 alone and the tank mixture of metribuzin (100 and 200 g) alongwith chlorsulfuron (15 g) and metsulfuron methyl (2 g) was effective in controlling complex weed flora. Metsulfuron methyl at 4 g ha−1 and chlorsulfuron at 15 g ha−1 were effective only against broad leaf weeds. While isoproturon at 1000 g hx1 was effective against P. minor. The efficacy of tank mixture of metsulfuron methyl at 2 g ha−1 and isoproturon at 500 g ha−1 was very poor against both types of weeds. The highest grain yield of wheat (4400 and 5000 kg ha−1) was obtained in repeated weeded plot during both the years. Grain yields obtained with the application of chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1, metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1 alone and combined application of chlorsulfuron at 15 g ha−1 and metribuzin at 100 and 200 g ha−1 were statistically similar to weed-free during both the seasons. Metribuzin either alone at 200 and 400 g ha−1 or in combinations with metsulfuron methyl showed phytotoxic effect on wheat crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1 controlled complex weed flora.

Treatment
chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1e0
Interactor
weed florae0weed
Outcome
controlling complex weed florae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1, metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1, metribuzin at 200, 400 g ha−1 alone and the tank mixture of metribuzin (100 and 200 g) alongwith chlorsulfuron (15 g) and metsulfuron methyl (2 g) was effective in controlling complex weed flora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1 controlled complex weed flora.

Treatment
metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1e0
Interactor
weed florae0weed
Outcome
controlling complex weed florae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1, metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1, metribuzin at 200, 400 g ha−1 alone and the tank mixture of metribuzin (100 and 200 g) alongwith chlorsulfuron (15 g) and metsulfuron methyl (2 g) was effective in controlling complex weed flora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

metribuzin at 200, 400 g ha−1 controlled complex weed flora.

Treatment
metribuzin at 200, 400 g ha−1e0
Interactor
weed florae0weed
Outcome
controlling complex weed florae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1, metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1, metribuzin at 200, 400 g ha−1 alone and the tank mixture of metribuzin (100 and 200 g) alongwith chlorsulfuron (15 g) and metsulfuron methyl (2 g) was effective in controlling complex weed flora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

tank mixture of metribuzin (100 and 200 g) alongwith chlorsulfuron (15 g) and metsulfuron methyl (2 g) controlled complex weed flora.

Treatment
tank mixture of metribuzin (100 and 200 g) alongwith chlorsulfuron (15 g) and metsulfuron methyl (2 g)e0
Interactor
weed florae0weed
Outcome
controlling complex weed florae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1, metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1, metribuzin at 200, 400 g ha−1 alone and the tank mixture of metribuzin (100 and 200 g) alongwith chlorsulfuron (15 g) and metsulfuron methyl (2 g) was effective in controlling complex weed flora.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metsulfuron methyl at 4 g ha−1 controlled broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
Metsulfuron methyl at 4 g ha−1e0
Interactor
broad leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
broad leaf weedse0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metsulfuron methyl at 4 g ha−1 and chlorsulfuron at 15 g ha−1 were effective only against broad leaf weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorsulfuron at 15 g ha−1 controlled broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
chlorsulfuron at 15 g ha−1e0
Interactor
broad leaf weedse0weed
Outcome
broad leaf weedse0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metsulfuron methyl at 4 g ha−1 and chlorsulfuron at 15 g ha−1 were effective only against broad leaf weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon controlled P. minor.

Treatment
isoproturon at 1000 g hx1e0
Interactor
P. minore0weed
Outcome
P. minore0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While isoproturon at 1000 g hx1 was effective against P. minor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The metsulfuron methyl and isoproturon mixture had poor weed control.

Treatment
tank mixture of metsulfuron methyl at 2 g ha−1 and isoproturon at 500 g ha−1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
very poore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy of tank mixture of metsulfuron methyl at 2 g ha−1 and isoproturon at 500 g ha−1 was very poor against both types of weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated weeding yielded 4400 and 5000 kg ha−1, the highest yields in the two years.

Treatment
repeated weeded plote0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4400 and 5000 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield of wheat (4400 and 5000 kg ha−1) was obtained in repeated weeded plot during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Several herbicide treatments had grain yields statistically similar to weed-free plots.

Treatment
application of chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1, metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1 alone and combined application of chlorsulfuron at 15 g ha−1 and metribuzin at 100 and 200 g ha−1e0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
statistically similare0
Comparator
weed-freee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields obtained with the application of chlorsulfuron at 30 g ha−1, metsulfuron methyl at 8 g ha−1 alone and combined application of chlorsulfuron at 15 g ha−1 and metribuzin at 100 and 200 g ha−1 were statistically similar to weed-free during both the seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticurn aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin treatments caused wheat phytotoxicity.

Treatment
Metribuzin either alone at 200 and 400 g ha−1 or in combinations with metsulfuron methyle0
Outcome
phytotoxic effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin either alone at 200 and 400 g ha−1 or in combinations with metsulfuron methyl showed phytotoxic effect on wheat crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1092 · show in text ↑

chlorsulfuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 12 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

isoproturon · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

chlorsulfuron · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

metribuzin · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.