Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) productivity as affected by application of low dose herbicides as sole and premix formulations

N.K. CHOPRA; NISHA CHOPRA

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter season of 2006-07 and 2007-08 at Karnal to evaluate the effect of herbicides as sole and their premix formulations on weed control in wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) Emend. Fiori and Paol]. Maximum average seed yield of 4.59 t/ha was recorded with premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ ha, which was at par with weed free treatment and 10.0 and 20.8% higher compared to sole application of clodinafop 60g/ha and metsulfuron 4g/ha respectively. Sole application of clodinafop 60g/ha was found effective only on grasses, whereas metsulfuron 4g/ha showed selectivity towards broadleaf weeds and both the treatments recorded lower weed control efficiency and higher weed index compared to premix formulations of clodinafop + metsulfuron at 45+3, 54+3.6and 60+4g/ha. Uncontrolled weeds caused 24.7% reduction in wheat yield. Maximum returns and benefit cost ratio was recorded with clodinafop+ metsulfuron 60+4g/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The clodinafop and metsulfuron premix at 60+4g/ ha gave maximum wheat seed yield of 4.59 t/ha.

Treatment
premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ hae0
Outcome
average seed yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
4.59 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum average seed yield of 4.59 t/ha was recorded with premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Premix seed yield was 10.0% higher than sole clodinafop.

Treatment
premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ hae1
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
highere0
Value
10.0e0
Comparator
sole application of clodinafop 60g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.0 and 20.8% higher compared to sole application of clodinafop 60g/ha and metsulfuron 4g/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–337 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum average seed yield of 4.59 t/ha was recorded with premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Premix seed yield was 20.8% higher than sole metsulfuron.

Treatment
premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ hae1
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
highere0
Value
20.8%e0
Comparator
metsulfuron 4g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10.0 and 20.8% higher compared to sole application of clodinafop 60g/ha and metsulfuron 4g/ha respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–491 · show in text ↑
e1

“premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–337 · show in text ↑
e2

“Maximum average seed yield of 4.59 t/ha was recorded with premix clodinafop + metsulfuron at 60+4g/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole clodinafop was effective only on grasses.

Treatment
Sole application of clodinafop 60g/hae0
Interactor
grassese0weed
Outcome
effective only on grassese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sole application of clodinafop 60g/ha was found effective only on grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole metsulfuron selected against broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
metsulfuron 4g/hae0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
selectivity towards broadleaf weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metsulfuron 4g/ha showed selectivity towards broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole herbicides had lower weed-control efficiency than premix formulations.

Treatment
both the treatmentse0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
premix formulations of clodinafop + metsulfuron at 45+3, 54+3.6and 60+4g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the treatments recorded lower weed control efficiency and higher weed index compared to premix formulations of clodinafop + metsulfuron at 45+3, 54+3.6and 60+4g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole herbicides had higher weed index than premix formulations.

Treatment
both the treatmentse0
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
premix formulations of clodinafop + metsulfuron at 45+3, 54+3.6and 60+4g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both the treatments recorded lower weed control efficiency and higher weed index compared to premix formulations of clodinafop + metsulfuron at 45+3, 54+3.6and 60+4g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uncontrolled weeds reduced wheat yield by 24.7%.

Treatment
Uncontrolled weedse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
24.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uncontrolled weeds caused 24.7% reduction in wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop plus metsulfuron at 60+4g/ha gave maximum returns and benefit cost ratio.

Treatment
clodinafop+ metsulfuron 60+4g/hae0
Outcome
returns and benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum returns and benefit cost ratio was recorded with clodinafop+ metsulfuron 60+4g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

metsulfuron methyl · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.