Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF HERBICIDES AND UREA AS ADDITIVE ON WHEAT, NUTRIENT UPTAKE, PHOTOSYNTHETIC PIGMENTS AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS

I. Soliman; G. Abd El-Hamed; A. Fadl - Allah

20
claims
26
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during successive seasons of 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 at Sakha Agricultural Research Station to study the effect of herbicides and urea as an additive to herbicides on wheat, NPK uptake, photosynthetic pigments and associated weeds. The results indicated that using the recommended rate of herbicides, (isoproturon + diflufenican) at 300g a.i./fed. for control total annual weeds, tribenuron-methyl at 6.0g a.i/fed. for control broad-leaved weeds and clodinafop propargyl at 21g a.i./fed for control grassy weeds as applied alone post- emergence as well as hand weeding twice, gave excellent weed control (93.6, 68.0, 45.9 and 93.6 % ), respectively. While, the same herbicides when applied at moderate rate (isoproturon + diflufenican) at 244.5g a.i./fed, tribenuron-methyl at 4.5g a.i /fed and clodinafop propargyl at 15.75g a.i/fed) mixing with 1% urea increased the herbicides efficiency in controlling the annual weeds by about ( 90.2, 65.9 and 44.5 %). Mixing 1% urea with the same herbicides at low rate (isoproturon + diflufenican at 165g a.i/fed, tribenuron-methyl at 3.0g a.i/fed and clodinafop propargyl at 10.5g a.i/fed) gave poor weed control and were significantly less efficient than the other treatments at the first survey in the first season. Hand weeding treatment, (isoproturon + diflufenican), tribenuron-methyl and clodinafop propargyl at high rate, alone as post-emergence as well as the same herbicides at moderate rate plus 1% urea had higher efficiency in controlling annual weeds and increased the plant height, spike length, weight of grains/ spike, number of grains/spike, straw yield (ton/fed) and grains yield (Ardab/fed), compared with the other treatments used. All herbicidal treatments as well as hand weeding treatment increased protein, phosphors, potassium and carbohydrate percentages and their uptake kg/fed in wheat grains over control treatment. Data also, cleared that all herbicides treatments slightly decreased chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll and; increased carotene content. From results of correlation analysis the fresh weight of total weeds, grassy weeds and broad-leaved weeds biomass were negative correlated with wheat yield. Grassy weeds were more aggressive in their competitiveness effect than broad-leaved weeds on wheat yield and its components. These results indicated that under heavy infested with annual weeds, it is possible to apply herbicides i.e.(isoproturon + diflufenican) for annual weeds control, tribenuron-methyl for broad-leaved weeds control and clodinafop propargyl for grassy weeds control at high rate alone or same herbicides at moderate rates mixed with 1% urea. These findings revealed obviously that such weed control measure can minimize weed /wheat competition and consequently gave the highest reduction in weeds and increase wheat yield and its components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended-rate isoproturon plus diflufenican gave 93.6% control of total annual weeds.

Taxon
total annual weedse0
Treatment
(isoproturon + diflufenican) at 300g a.i./fed.e0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
excellente0
Value
93.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“using the recommended rate of herbicides, (isoproturon + diflufenican) at 300g a.i./fed. for control total annual weeds, tribenuron-methyl at 6.0g a.i/fed. for control broad-leaved weeds and clodinafop propargyl at 21g a.i./fed for control grassy weeds as applied alone post- emergence as well as hand weeding twice, gave excellent weed control (93.6, 68.0, 45.9 and 93.6 % ), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended-rate tribenuron-methyl gave 68.0% broad-leaved weed control.

Taxon
broad-leaved weedse0
Treatment
tribenuron-methyl at 6.0g a.i/fed.e0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
excellente0
Value
68.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl at 6.0g a.i/fed. for control broad-leaved weeds and clodinafop propargyl at 21g a.i./fed for control grassy weeds as applied alone post- emergence as well as hand weeding twice, gave excellent weed control (93.6, 68.0, 45.9 and 93.6 % ), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended-rate clodinafop propargyl gave 45.9% grassy weed control.

Taxon
grassy weedse0
Treatment
clodinafop propargyl at 21g a.i./fede0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
excellente0
Value
45.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop propargyl at 21g a.i./fed for control grassy weeds as applied alone post- emergence as well as hand weeding twice, gave excellent weed control (93.6, 68.0, 45.9 and 93.6 % ), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice gave 93.6% weed control.

Taxon
weede0
Treatment
hand weeding twicee0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
excellente0
Value
93.6 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“hand weeding twice, gave excellent weed control (93.6, 68.0, 45.9 and 93.6 % ), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate-rate isoproturon plus diflufenican with 1% urea gave about 90.2% annual weed control.

Taxon
annual weedse0
Treatment
(isoproturon + diflufenican) at 244.5g a.i./fede0
Outcome
efficiency in controlling the annual weedse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
90.2e0
Qualifier
mixing with 1% ureae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the same herbicides when applied at moderate rate (isoproturon + diflufenican) at 244.5g a.i./fed, tribenuron-methyl at 4.5g a.i /fed and clodinafop propargyl at 15.75g a.i/fed) mixing with 1% urea increased the herbicides efficiency in controlling the annual weeds by about ( 90.2, 65.9 and 44.5 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate-rate tribenuron-methyl with 1% urea gave about 65.9% annual weed control.

Taxon
annual weedse0
Treatment
tribenuron-methyl at 4.5g a.i /fede0
Outcome
efficiency in controlling the annual weedse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
65.9e0
Qualifier
mixing with 1% ureae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl at 4.5g a.i /fed and clodinafop propargyl at 15.75g a.i/fed) mixing with 1% urea increased the herbicides efficiency in controlling the annual weeds by about ( 90.2, 65.9 and 44.5 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate-rate clodinafop propargyl with 1% urea gave about 44.5% annual weed control.

Taxon
annual weedse0
Treatment
clodinafop propargyl at 15.75g a.i/fede0
Outcome
efficiency in controlling the annual weedse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44.5 %e0
Qualifier
mixing with 1% ureae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop propargyl at 15.75g a.i/fed) mixing with 1% urea increased the herbicides efficiency in controlling the annual weeds by about ( 90.2, 65.9 and 44.5 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-rate isoproturon plus diflufenican mixed with urea gave poor control and significantly lower efficiency at the first survey of the first season.

Taxon
weede0
Treatment
isoproturon + diflufenican at 165g a.i/fede0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
less efficiente0
Qualifier
Mixing 1% ureae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Mixing 1% urea with the same herbicides at low rate (isoproturon + diflufenican at 165g a.i/fed, tribenuron-methyl at 3.0g a.i/fed and clodinafop propargyl at 10.5g a.i/fed) gave poor weed control and were significantly less efficient than the other treatments at the first survey in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-rate tribenuron-methyl mixed with urea gave poor control and significantly lower efficiency at the first survey of the first season.

Taxon
weede0
Treatment
tribenuron-methyl at 3.0g a.i/fede0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
less efficiente0
Qualifier
Mixing 1% ureae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Mixing 1% urea with the same herbicides at low rate (isoproturon + diflufenican at 165g a.i/fed, tribenuron-methyl at 3.0g a.i/fed and clodinafop propargyl at 10.5g a.i/fed) gave poor weed control and were significantly less efficient than the other treatments at the first survey in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-rate clodinafop propargyl mixed with urea gave poor control and significantly lower efficiency at the first survey of the first season.

Taxon
weede0
Treatment
clodinafop propargyl at 10.5g a.i/fede0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
less efficiente0
Qualifier
Mixing 1% ureae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Mixing 1% urea with the same herbicides at low rate (isoproturon + diflufenican at 165g a.i/fed, tribenuron-methyl at 3.0g a.i/fed and clodinafop propargyl at 10.5g a.i/fed) gave poor weed control and were significantly less efficient than the other treatments at the first survey in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-rate herbicides, moderate-rate herbicides with urea, and hand weeding increased wheat growth and yield components relative to other treatments.

Treatment
Hand weeding treatment, (isoproturon + diflufenican), tribenuron-methyl and clodinafop propargyl at high rate, alone as post-emergence as well as the same herbicides at moderate rate plus 1% ureae0
Outcome
plant height, spike length, weight of grains/ spike, number of grains/spike, straw yield (ton/fed) and grains yield (Ardab/fed)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other treatments usede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: Grouped nonnumeric treatment and yield results to retain the separate valued results within the claim budget.

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding treatment, (isoproturon + diflufenican), tribenuron-methyl and clodinafop propargyl at high rate, alone as post-emergence as well as the same herbicides at moderate rate plus 1% urea had higher efficiency in controlling annual weeds and increased the plant height, spike length, weight of grains/ spike, number of grains/spike, straw yield (ton/fed) and grains yield (Ardab/fed), compared with the other treatments used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1730 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides and hand weeding increased grain protein, phosphorus, potassium and carbohydrate percentages and uptake over control.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
All herbicidal treatments as well as hand weeding treatmente0
Outcome
protein, phosphors, potassium and carbohydrate percentages and their uptake kg/fede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: Grouped nonnumeric composition results within the claim budget.

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicidal treatments as well as hand weeding treatment increased protein, phosphors, potassium and carbohydrate percentages and their uptake kg/fed in wheat grains over control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicide treatments slightly decreased chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll.

Treatment
all herbicides treatmentse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data also, cleared that all herbicides treatments slightly decreased chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll and; increased carotene content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–2064 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicide treatments increased wheat carotene content.

Treatment
all herbicides treatmentse0
Outcome
carotene contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data also, cleared that all herbicides treatments slightly decreased chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll and; increased carotene content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–2064 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh biomass of total, grassy and broad-leaved weeds was negatively correlated with wheat yield.

Interactor
total weedse0weed
Second interactor
grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
negative correlatede0
Qualifier
broad-leaved weedse0
Comparator
fresh weight of total weeds, grassy weeds and broad-leaved weeds biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From results of correlation analysis the fresh weight of total weeds, grassy weeds and broad-leaved weeds biomass were negative correlated with wheat yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2065–2221 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grassy weeds were more competitive than broad-leaved weeds against wheat yield and its components.

Interactor
Grassy weedse0weed
Second interactor
broad-leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
wheat yield and its componentse0
Direction
more aggressivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grassy weeds were more aggressive in their competitiveness effect than broad-leaved weeds on wheat yield and its components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2222–2346 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend high-rate isoproturon plus diflufenican alone or moderate rates with urea under heavy annual weed infestation.

Interactor
annual weedse0weed
Outcome
(isoproturon + diflufenican) for annual weeds controle0
Qualifier
at high rate alone or same herbicides at moderate rates mixed with 1% ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results indicated that under heavy infested with annual weeds, it is possible to apply herbicides i.e.(isoproturon + diflufenican) for annual weeds control, tribenuron-methyl for broad-leaved weeds control and clodinafop propargyl for grassy weeds control at high rate alone or same herbicides at moderate rates mixed with 1% urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2347–2684 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend high-rate tribenuron-methyl alone or moderate rates with urea against broad-leaved weeds.

Interactor
broad-leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
tribenuron-methyl for broad-leaved weeds controle0
Qualifier
at high rate alone or same herbicides at moderate rates mixed with 1% ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tribenuron-methyl for broad-leaved weeds control and clodinafop propargyl for grassy weeds control at high rate alone or same herbicides at moderate rates mixed with 1% urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2510–2684 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend high-rate clodinafop propargyl alone or moderate rates with urea against grassy weeds.

Interactor
grassy weedse0weed
Outcome
clodinafop propargyl for grassy weeds controle0
Qualifier
at high rate alone or same herbicides at moderate rates mixed with 1% ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clodinafop propargyl for grassy weeds control at high rate alone or same herbicides at moderate rates mixed with 1% urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2563–2684 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that these measures minimize weed competition, maximize weed reduction, and increase wheat yield and components.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
increase wheat yield and its componentse0
Qualifier
minimize weed /wheat competitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These findings revealed obviously that such weed control measure can minimize weed /wheat competition and consequently gave the highest reduction in weeds and increase wheat yield and its components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2685–2884 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

tribenuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

diflufenican · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 4 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

herbicide · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

33 papers: 20 positive, 13 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.