Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFICACY OF SOME HERBICIDES ON WHEAT CROP AND ASSOCIATED WEEDS AND DETECTING ITS RESIDUES IN WHEAT PLANT AND SOIL.

I. Soliman; Amany Hamza

20
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during the successive seasons of 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 at Sakha Agricultural Research Station to study the effect of SOME herbicides on wheat, NPK uptake, associated weeds and determine its residues in soil, leaves and grains of wheat plant. The results indicated that using the herbicides Granstar at 8.0 g/fed for control broad-leaved weeds, Traxos at 0.5 L/fed for control grassy weeds and Panther at 0.6 L/fed and (Granstar/Traxos) for control annual weeds as applied post-emergence as well as hand weeding twice, gave excellent weed control. Hand weeding treatment, Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) obviously increased plant height, spike length, weight of grains/spike, number of grains/spike, straw yield (ton/fed) and grain yield (ardab/fed) of wheat as compared with the control treatment. All herbicidal treatments as well as hand weeding treatment increased protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages and their uptake (kg/fed) in wheat grains over control treatment. The times for 50% loss of initial Granstar in soil were 50.79 and 48.33 days. The loss of initial concentration in the leaves were (0.29 and 0.74 ppm) in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively. The Granstar residue become undetected in grains of the two growing seasons after 159 days from application. At the end of experiments about 97.73 and 97.32% of initial traxos in the soil in both seasons were lost. After 90 days, only 0.22 and 0.26 ppm of Traxos were reached to the grains. At the end of experiment (145 days), there were no residues in the grains of the two growing seasons. The times for 50% loss of initial Panther in soil were 56.78 and 53.67 days and the loss of initial concentrations reached 97.32 and 98.84%. At the end of the experiment (152 days) there were no Panther residues in wheat grains in the two growing seasons. These results indicated that under heavy infestation with annual weed, it is possible to apply herbicides i.e. Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) treatments for annual weeds control, Granstar for broad-leaved weeds control and Traxos for grassy weeds control. These findings revealed obviously that such weed control measure can minimize weed/wheat competition and consequently gave the highest reduction in weeds and increase wheat yield, without any effect on wheat plants or on soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides applied post-emergence, and hand weeding, gave excellent weed control in wheat.

Treatment
herbicidese2
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
excellent weed controle1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“as well as hand weeding twice, gave excellent weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–584 · show in text ↑
e2

“using the herbicides Granstar at 8.0 g/fed for control broad-leaved weeds, Traxos at 0.5 L/fed for control grassy weeds and Panther at 0.6 L/fed and (Granstar/Traxos) for control annual weeds as applied post-emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding, Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) increased plant height, spike length and weight of grains per spike in wheat compared with the control.

Treatment
Hand weeding treatment, Panther and (Granstar/Traxos)e1
Outcome
plant height, spike length, weight of grains/spikee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hand weeding treatment, Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) obviously increased plant height, spike length, weight of grains/spike, number of grains/spike, straw yield (ton/fed) and grain yield (ardab/fed) of wheat as compared with the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding, Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) increased the number of grains per spike, straw yield and grain yield of wheat compared with the control.

Treatment
Hand weeding treatment, Panther and (Granstar/Traxos)e1
Outcome
number of grains/spike, straw yield (ton/fed) and grain yield (ardab/fed)e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hand weeding treatment, Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) obviously increased plant height, spike length, weight of grains/spike, number of grains/spike, straw yield (ton/fed) and grain yield (ardab/fed) of wheat as compared with the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicidal treatments and hand weeding increased the protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages of wheat grains over the control.

Organ / stage
wheat grainse1
Treatment
All herbicidal treatments as well as hand weeding treatmente1
Outcome
protein, phosphorus and potassium percentagese1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All herbicidal treatments as well as hand weeding treatment increased protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages and their uptake (kg/fed) in wheat grains over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicidal treatments and hand weeding increased the uptake of protein, phosphorus and potassium by wheat grains.

Organ / stage
wheat grainse1
Treatment
All herbicidal treatments as well as hand weeding treatmente1
Outcome
their uptake (kg/fed)e1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
protein, phosphorus and potassiume1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All herbicidal treatments as well as hand weeding treatment increased protein, phosphorus and potassium percentages and their uptake (kg/fed) in wheat grains over control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–1015 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granstar took 50.79 and 48.33 days for 50% loss of its initial concentration in soil.

Outcome
times for 50% loss of initial Granstar in soile1
Value
50.79 and 48.33 dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“The times for 50% loss of initial Granstar in soil were 50.79 and 48.33 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1093 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loss of initial herbicide concentration in wheat leaves was 0.29 and 0.74 ppm in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
loss of initial concentration in the leavese1
Value
0.29 and 0.74 ppme1
Qualifier
in the 1st and 2nd seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“The loss of initial concentration in the leaves were (0.29 and 0.74 ppm) in the 1st and 2nd seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1208 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granstar residue became undetected in wheat grains after 159 days from application.

Organ / stage
grainse1
Outcome
Granstar residuee1
Qualifier
undetected in grains of the two growing seasons after 159 days from applicatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Granstar residue become undetected in grains of the two growing seasons after 159 days from application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1317 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 97.73 and 97.32% of initial Traxos in soil was lost by the end of the experiments.

Outcome
initial traxos in the soile1
Value
97.73 and 97.32%e1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the end of experiments about 97.73 and 97.32% of initial traxos in the soil in both seasons were lost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1423 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 0.22 and 0.26 ppm of Traxos reached the wheat grains after 90 days.

Organ / stage
grainse1
Outcome
of Traxos were reached to the grainse1
Value
0.22 and 0.26 ppme1
Qualifier
After 90 dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“After 90 days, only 0.22 and 0.26 ppm of Traxos were reached to the grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1499 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No Traxos residues were found in wheat grains at 145 days after application.

Organ / stage
grainse1
Outcome
residues in the grainse1
Qualifier
At the end of experiment (145 days)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the end of experiment (145 days), there were no residues in the grains of the two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1601 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Panther took 56.78 and 53.67 days for 50% loss of its initial concentration in soil.

Outcome
times for 50% loss of initial Panther in soile1
Value
56.78 and 53.67 dayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“The times for 50% loss of initial Panther in soil were 56.78 and 53.67 days and the loss of initial concentrations reached 97.32 and 98.84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1742 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial Panther concentrations in soil were lost by 97.32 and 98.84%.

Outcome
loss of initial concentrationse1
Value
97.32 and 98.84%e1
Qualifier
Panther in soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“The times for 50% loss of initial Panther in soil were 56.78 and 53.67 days and the loss of initial concentrations reached 97.32 and 98.84%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1742 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No Panther residues were found in wheat grains at the end of the experiment (152 days).

Outcome
Panther residues in wheat grainse1
Qualifier
At the end of the experiment (152 days)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“At the end of the experiment (152 days) there were no Panther residues in wheat grains in the two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1857 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under heavy infestation with annual weeds, Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) treatments can be applied to control annual weeds in wheat.

Treatment
Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) treatmentse1
Interactor
annual weedse1weed
Outcome
annual weeds controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“it is possible to apply herbicides i.e. Panther and (Granstar/Traxos) treatments for annual weeds control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2035 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Granstar can be applied for control of broad-leaved weeds in wheat.

Treatment
Granstare1
Interactor
broad-leaved weedse1weed
Outcome
broad-leaved weeds controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“Granstar for broad-leaved weeds control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2076 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Traxos can be applied for control of grassy weeds in wheat.

Treatment
Traxose1
Interactor
grassy weedse1weed
Outcome
grassy weeds controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ON WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“Traxos for grassy weeds control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2081–2112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Such weed control measure gave the highest reduction in weeds.

Treatment
such weed control measuree2
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
reduction in weedse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“consequently gave the highest reduction in weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2219–2267 · show in text ↑
e2

“such weed control measure can minimize weed/wheat competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Such weed control measure can minimize weed/wheat competition.

Treatment
such weed control measuree2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed/wheat competitione2
Direction
minimizee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“such weed control measure can minimize weed/wheat competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Such weed control measure had no effect on wheat plants or on soil.

Treatment
such weed control measuree2
Outcome
effect on wheat plants or on soile3
Direction
without any effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“such weed control measure can minimize weed/wheat competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2153–2214 · show in text ↑
e3

“without any effect on wheat plants or on soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2294–2339 · show in text ↑

herbicide · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

33 papers: 20 positive, 13 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

herbicide · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 21 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.