Claim · model-written summary
Differences in grain yield and grain protein content between the two weed control methods were negligible.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- two weed control methodse4
- Outcome
- Yield and GPC differencese4
- Direction
- negligiblee4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“wheat grain yield and quality components”
e4“Yield and GPC differences between the two weed control methods were negligible”
Title
MK Seepamore; CC du Preez; GM Ceronio South African Journal of Plant and Soil 2020. doi:10.1080/02571862.2020.1741707
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Grain protein content was affected to a larger extent than hectolitre mass and falling number by the long-term management practices.
- Observation Grain yield and grain protein content varied over the long-term, probably due to annual rainfall variation and distribution.
- Intervention effect Grain yield was significantly higher with residue burning than with no residue burning.
- Intervention effect Grain protein content was lower with residue burning than with no residue burning.
- Intervention effect Grain yield and grain protein content increased significantly with tillage intensity.
- Intervention effect Grain yield increased slightly with higher nitrogen application.
- Intervention effect Grain protein content increased significantly with higher nitrogen application.
- Recommendation Incorporating crop rotation with conservation agriculture practices can probably improve wheat results and requires further investigation.