Paper · 2025 · Medicinal Plants - International Journal of Phytomedicines and Related Industries

Enhancing potted oregano (Origanum vulgare) production under open cultivation through optimized potting media and nutrient inputs

G.R. Smitha; D. Kalaivanan; Sujatha A. Nair

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Oregano (Origanum vulgare), a perennial herb valued for its culinary, aromatic and medicinal applications, is gaining popularity in urban and peri-urban gardening systems for its culinary use and therapeutic benefits. This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of different potting media and nutrient inputs on the growth and yield of potted oregano, aiming to optimize pot herb production. The experiment was carried out for three seasons of 2021–2022 using a factorial completely randomized design. Factor A consisting of three potting substrates - S1: Red soil + FYM + sand (1:1:1 v/v), S2: Arka Fermented Cocopeat (AFC) + vermicompost (1:1 v/v), and S3: AFC alone. Factor B comprised of four nutrient combinations - N1: 128:24:144 ppm NPK, N2: 96:18:108 ppm NPK, N3: Jeevamrutha @ 50 ml/pot, and N4: Jeevamrutha @ 100 ml/pot which were applied at weekly intervals. Growth and yield parameters including plant height, number of branches, spread, number of leaves, and fresh and dry weight were recorded. The results revealed that the substrate S2 (AFC + vermicompost) significantly improved plant height (15.25 cm), number of branches (16.95), number of leaves (176.67 leaves/plant) and (6.65 g dry herb plant yield). The nutrient treatment N3 (Jeevamrutha @ 50 ml/pot) enhanced fresh (22.71 g) and dry (6.81 g) biomass accumulation. Interaction effects further indicated that combining organic substrate AFC + vermicompost with Jeevamrutha (S2N3) led to superior plant performance compared to conventional soil-based media. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing substrate and nutrient inputs for efficient and high-quality oregano production in potted systems, offering a viable approach for urban gardeners and small-scale herb farming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AFC plus vermicompost significantly improved oregano plant height to 15.25 cm.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
S2 (AFC + vermicompost)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
improvede0
Value
15.25 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the substrate S2 (AFC + vermicompost) significantly improved plant height (15.25 cm), number of branches (16.95), number of leaves (176.67 leaves/plant) and (6.65 g dry herb plant yield)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AFC plus vermicompost significantly improved oregano number of branches to 16.95.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
S2 (AFC + vermicompost)e0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
improvede0
Value
16.95e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the substrate S2 (AFC + vermicompost) significantly improved plant height (15.25 cm), number of branches (16.95), number of leaves (176.67 leaves/plant) and (6.65 g dry herb plant yield)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AFC plus vermicompost significantly improved oregano number of leaves to 176.67 leaves/plant.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
S2 (AFC + vermicompost)e0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
improvede0
Value
176.67 leaves/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the substrate S2 (AFC + vermicompost) significantly improved plant height (15.25 cm), number of branches (16.95), number of leaves (176.67 leaves/plant) and (6.65 g dry herb plant yield)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AFC plus vermicompost significantly improved oregano dry herb plant yield to 6.65 g.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
S2 (AFC + vermicompost)e0
Outcome
dry herb plant yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
6.65 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the substrate S2 (AFC + vermicompost) significantly improved plant height (15.25 cm), number of branches (16.95), number of leaves (176.67 leaves/plant) and (6.65 g dry herb plant yield)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jeevamrutha at 50 ml/pot enhanced oregano fresh biomass to 22.71 g.

Taxon
oreganoOriganum vulgaret0
Treatment
N3 (Jeevamrutha @ 50 ml/pot)e0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.71 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrient treatment N3 (Jeevamrutha @ 50 ml/pot) enhanced fresh (22.71 g) and dry (6.81 g) biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“oregano (Origanum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jeevamrutha at 50 ml/pot enhanced oregano dry biomass to 6.81 g.

Taxon
oreganoOriganum vulgaret0
Treatment
N3 (Jeevamrutha @ 50 ml/pot)e0
Outcome
drye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
6.81 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrient treatment N3 (Jeevamrutha @ 50 ml/pot) enhanced fresh (22.71 g) and dry (6.81 g) biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“oregano (Origanum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined AFC, vermicompost and Jeevamrutha produced superior oregano performance over conventional soil media.

Taxon
oreganoOriganum vulgaret0
Treatment
combining organic substrate AFC + vermicompost with Jeevamrutha (S2N3)e0
Outcome
superior plant performancee0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
conventional soil-based mediae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining organic substrate AFC + vermicompost with Jeevamrutha (S2N3) led to superior plant performance compared to conventional soil-based media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“oregano (Origanum vulgare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–43 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Origanum vulgare (oregano)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · growth · Origanum vulgare (oregano)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Origanum vulgare (oregano)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.