Paper · 2023 · Plants

Effect of Different Soil Treatments on Production and Chemical Composition of Essential Oils Extracted from Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.

Antonio Raffo; Filippo Umberto Sapienza; Roberta Astolfi; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate how essential oil production and associated chemical composition and related biological activity could be influenced by different cultivation treatments and distillation methods. Foeniculum vulgare Mill. (fennel), Origanum vulgare L. (oregano) and Thymus vulgaris L. (thyme) were cultivated in absence of any fertilizer (control) and in presence of three different fertilizers: a chemical one with augmented mineral phosphorus and potassium, a second added with hydrolyzed organic substance and mineral phosphorus and potassium (organic–mineral) and a third one treated with a high content of organic nitrogen of protein origin (organic). The plants were subjected to steam distillation using two modalities, recycled and continuous, to obtain 32 essential oil samples. Chemical composition analysis was performed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; in vitro antimicrobial activity was evaluated using a broth microdilution method. In general, the recycled distillation method appeared to have a slightly higher yield than the continuous method. The “mineral” and “organic–mineral” treatments resulted in a higher yield compared to the “organic” or “control” treatments, and this was particularly evident in the recycled method. The “control” plants had a lower yield of essential oils. Anethole (13.9–59.5%) and estragole (13.4–52.2%) were the main constituents of the fennel oils; p-cymene and its derivatives carvacrol and thymol were the main constituents of the oregano and thyme samples. The antimicrobial activity of the thyme oils on Staphylococcus aureus ranged from 0.31 to 0.16% (v/v); a lower effect of the oregano samples and no activity of the fennel samples were observed. The essential oils failed to inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recycled distillation gave slightly higher essential oil yield than continuous distillation.

Taxon
Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.Origanum vulgareThymus vulgarisAnethum foeniculumt0
Treatment
recycled distillation methode0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
continuous methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the recycled distillation method appeared to have a slightly higher yield than the continuous method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer gave higher essential oil yield than organic or control treatments, particularly with recycled distillation.

Taxon
Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.Origanum vulgareThymus vulgarisAnethum foeniculumt0
Treatment
“mineral”e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
recycled methode0
Comparator
“organic” or “control” treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The “mineral” and “organic–mineral” treatments resulted in a higher yield compared to the “organic” or “control” treatments, and this was particularly evident in the recycled method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic–mineral fertilizer gave higher essential oil yield than organic or control treatments, particularly with recycled distillation.

Taxon
Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.Origanum vulgareThymus vulgarisAnethum foeniculumt0
Treatment
“organic–mineral”e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
“organic” or “control” treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The “mineral” and “organic–mineral” treatments resulted in a higher yield compared to the “organic” or “control” treatments, and this was particularly evident in the recycled method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–176 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plants had lower essential oil yield.

Taxon
Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.Origanum vulgareThymus vulgarisAnethum foeniculumt0
Outcome
yield of essential oilse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The “control” plants had a lower yield of essential oils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–176 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anethole was a main constituent of fennel oils at 13.9–59.5%.

Outcome
Anetholee0
Value
13.9–59.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anethole (13.9–59.5%) and estragole (13.4–52.2%) were the main constituents of the fennel oils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1429 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estragole was a main constituent of fennel oils at 13.4–52.2%.

Outcome
estragolee0
Value
13.4–52.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Anethole (13.9–59.5%) and estragole (13.4–52.2%) were the main constituents of the fennel oils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1429 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-cymene, carvacrol and thymol were main constituents of oregano and thyme samples.

Taxon
oregano and thymeOriganum vulgareThymus vulgarise0
Outcome
p-cymene and its derivatives carvacrol and thymole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“p-cymene and its derivatives carvacrol and thymol were the main constituents of the oregano and thyme samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thyme oils showed antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus from 0.31 to 0.16% (v/v).

Outcome
antimicrobial activity of the thyme oils on Staphylococcus aureuse0
Value
0.31 to 0.16% (v/v)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The antimicrobial activity of the thyme oils on Staphylococcus aureus ranged from 0.31 to 0.16% (v/v)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1643 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oregano oils had lower antimicrobial effect on Staphylococcus aureus.

Taxon
oreganoOriganum vulgaree0
Outcome
effect of the oregano samplese0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a lower effect of the oregano samples and no activity of the fennel samples were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1734 · show in text ↑
e1

“The antimicrobial activity of the thyme oils on Staphylococcus aureus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1611 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel oils had no antimicrobial activity on Staphylococcus aureus.

Outcome
no activity of the fennel samplese0
Direction
no activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no activity of the fennel samples were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1734 · show in text ↑
e1

“The antimicrobial activity of the thyme oils on Staphylococcus aureus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1611 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The essential oils did not inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

Taxon
Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.Origanum vulgareThymus vulgarisAnethum foeniculumt0
Outcome
growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strainse0
Direction
failed to inhibite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Origanum vulgare
Origanum vulgare · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris · TaxonIsidre blanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The essential oils failed to inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1818 · show in text ↑
t0

“Foeniculum vulgare Mill., Origanum vulgare L. and Thymus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–176 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Origanum vulgare (oregano)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

processing · yield · Thymus vulgaris (thyme)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · yield · Anethum foeniculum (fennel)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.