Paper · 2025 · Archives of Current Research International

Cooking and Sensory Quality Characteristics of Flood-affected Rice Compared with Normal Rice

D. Srinath; K. Uma Maheswari; S. Sucharitha Devi; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Over 100 countries cultivate thousands of Oryza sativa cultivars. They can be divided into three widely grown ecological varieties: the medium-grained javonica rice, which is grown in the Philippines and the mountainous regions of Madagascar and Indonesia; the long-grained indica variety, which is grown in tropical and subtropical Asia; and the short/medium-grained japonica rice, which is grown in temperate regions like northern China and Japan. Saline, alkaline, and acid-sulfur soils are only a few of the soil types and water regimes in which rice is grown. Rice is a major component of the agricultural sector in particular and the overall economy in general. Over 20 % of rice fields in India are prone to floods every year. The produce obtained from such fields are often sold at low price causing economical loss to the farmers. Smallholder farmers are unable to predict sustainable adaptations and comprehend the possible effects of climate change on their farming methods. The output of tropical crops is therefore anticipated to be impacted by future climatic events, which raises worries about food insecurity, especially in rural communities. This study is quite important for the scientific community as it sheds light on how flood-affected rice compares to normal rice in terms of cooking and sensory qualities. Flooding is an increasingly common issue, especially in rice-growing regions, and it leads to significant crop losses. By comparing the two types of rice, the manuscript helps us understand how we can still use flood-affected rice in the food industry, especially for creating value-added products. This can help mitigate the economic loss that farmers face, making it a practical and valuable piece of research. Therefore, the present study was conducted to know the cooking and sensory quality characteristics of flood-affected rice in comparison with normal rice. Statistically significant difference in cooking time, cooking weight, cooking loss and elongation ratio was observed between the flood-affected rice and normal rice. The average sensory scores of rice showed a statistically significant difference between normal rice and rice affected by flooding. No notable difference was detected in the average scores for appearance, flavor, taste, texture, and overall quality among the samples. Consequently, paddy affected by floods can be used to create value-added products. Additional comprehensive studies are required for the use of paddy in creating more practical and accessible products to reduce losses in paddy affected by flooding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flood-affected rice differed significantly from normal rice in cooking time, cooking weight and cooking loss.

Treatment
flood-affectede0
Outcome
cooking time, cooking weight, cooking losse0
Comparator
normal ricee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistically significant difference in cooking time, cooking weight, cooking loss and elongation ratio was observed between the flood-affected rice and normal rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flood-affected rice differed significantly from normal rice in elongation ratio.

Treatment
flood-affectede0
Outcome
elongation ratioe0
Comparator
normal ricee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistically significant difference in cooking time, cooking weight, cooking loss and elongation ratio was observed between the flood-affected rice and normal rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1897–2061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average sensory scores differed significantly between normal rice and rice affected by flooding.

Treatment
rice affected by floodinge0
Outcome
average sensory scorese0
Comparator
normal ricee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average sensory scores of rice showed a statistically significant difference between normal rice and rice affected by flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flood-affected rice showed no notable difference from normal rice in appearance, flavor and taste.

Treatment
rice affected by floodinge1
Outcome
appearance, flavor, tastee0
Direction
No notable differencee0
Comparator
among the samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No notable difference was detected in the average scores for appearance, flavor, taste, texture, and overall quality among the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2195–2329 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average sensory scores of rice showed a statistically significant difference between normal rice and rice affected by flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flood-affected rice showed no notable difference from normal rice in texture and overall quality.

Treatment
rice affected by floodinge1
Outcome
texture, and overall qualitye0
Direction
No notable differencee0
Comparator
among the samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No notable difference was detected in the average scores for appearance, flavor, taste, texture, and overall quality among the samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2195–2329 · show in text ↑
e1

“The average sensory scores of rice showed a statistically significant difference between normal rice and rice affected by flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2193 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Flood-affected paddy can be used to create value-added products.

Taxon
paddye0
Outcome
value-added productse0

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, paddy affected by floods can be used to create value-added products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2331–2412 · show in text ↑

flooding · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

flooding · quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.