Paper · 2025 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

Greenhouse evaluation of microbial consortia against sucking pest complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)

V. Naveen; D. N. Kambrekar; C. P. Mallapur; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study evaluated the greenhouse efficacy of microbial consortia comprising actinobacteria, Pseudomonas spp. and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) against the major sucking pest complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.), including thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis), aphids (Aphis gossypii), and whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci). The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with twelve treatments, including individual and combined microbial formulations and a chemical check (Diafenthiuron 50% WP). Insects were artificially introduced, and pest counts were recorded at 30, 60, and 90 days after transplanting. Among all treatments, the microbial consortium T5 (DBT 64 + AUDT 502 + AUDP 279) consistently showed the highest suppression of all three pest species—reducing thrips, whiteflies, and aphids by 56.96%, 64.55%, and 48.78%, respectively. This efficacy is attributed to synergistic effects enhancing induced systemic resistance (ISR) and secondary metabolite production. While the insecticide achieved maximum suppression, microbial treatments offered comparable results with long-term ecological benefits. Lecanicillium lecanii also showed promising biocontrol potential under controlled conditions. The findings demonstrate that microbial consortia are effective, eco-friendly alternatives for managing sucking pests in chilli and hold strong potential for integration into sustainable pest management frameworks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 reduced thrips by 56.96%.

Taxon
chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume1
Treatment
microbial consortium T5 (DBT 64 + AUDT 502 + AUDP 279)e0
Interactor
Scirtothrips dorsalisScirtothrips dorsalise1pest
Outcome
thripse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
56.96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Scirtothrips dorsalis
Scirtothrips dorsalis · InteractorAderksen at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial consortium T5 (DBT 64 + AUDT 502 + AUDP 279) consistently showed the highest suppression of all three pest species—reducing thrips, whiteflies, and aphids by 56.96%, 64.55%, and 48.78%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“pest complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.), including thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis), aphids (Aphis gossypii), and whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 reduced whiteflies by 64.55%.

Taxon
chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume1
Treatment
microbial consortium T5 (DBT 64 + AUDT 502 + AUDP 279)e0
Interactor
Bemisia tabaciBemisia tabacie1pest
Outcome
whitefliese0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
64.55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial consortium T5 (DBT 64 + AUDT 502 + AUDP 279) consistently showed the highest suppression of all three pest species—reducing thrips, whiteflies, and aphids by 56.96%, 64.55%, and 48.78%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“pest complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.), including thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis), aphids (Aphis gossypii), and whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 reduced aphids by 48.78%.

Taxon
chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume1
Treatment
microbial consortium T5 (DBT 64 + AUDT 502 + AUDP 279)e0
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiie1pest
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
48.78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial consortium T5 (DBT 64 + AUDT 502 + AUDP 279) consistently showed the highest suppression of all three pest species—reducing thrips, whiteflies, and aphids by 56.96%, 64.55%, and 48.78%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“pest complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.), including thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis), aphids (Aphis gossypii), and whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The insecticide achieved maximum pest suppression.

Taxon
chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume2
Treatment
Diafenthiuron 50% WPe1
Outcome
suppressione0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
microbial treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While the insecticide achieved maximum suppression, microbial treatments offered comparable results with long-term ecological benefits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical check (Diafenthiuron 50% WP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–516 · show in text ↑
e2

“sucking pest complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lecanicillium lecanii showed promising biocontrol potential under controlled conditions.

Taxon
chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)Capsicum annuume1
Interactor
Lecanicillium lecaniiAkanthomyces lecaniie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
promising biocontrol potentiale0
Setting
controlled conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Akanthomyces lecanii
Akanthomyces lecanii · InteractorStephen Thorpe · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lecanicillium lecanii also showed promising biocontrol potential under controlled conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“sucking pest complex of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–227 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Bemisia tabaci · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.