Paper · 2025 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical

Efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae and Purpureocillium lilacinum isolates in the control of Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in cotton1

Bruno Scentinela Jacintho Paes; Henrique Roberto de Araújo; Claudio Marcelo Gonçalves de Oliveira; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Plant-parasitic nematodes such as Meloidogyne incognita cause severe damage to the cotton root system, impairing plant development and yield. The use of fungi-based nematicides presents a sustainable and promising alternative for nematode management. Two greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of isolates of the Metarhizium anisopliae and Purpureocillium lilacinum entomopathogenic fungi in controlling M. incognita, in TMG91WS3 cotton cultivar. The experiment 1 included 12 treatments: one inoculated control, four M. anisopliae isolates and seven P. lilacinum isolates, with four replicates. At 162 days after sowing, all treatments significantly reduced the final population of M. incognita, except M. anisopliae IBCB Ma03. The P. lilacinum IBCB Pl06 and M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04 isolates were the most effective, with reproduction factors below 1 and efficiency close to 80 %. The experiment 2 included 11 treatments: one control, four M. anisopliae and six P. lilacinum isolates, with six replicates. After 97 days, only the IBCB Pl06 isolate differed from the control in the final population variable, although all tested isolates, except M. anisopliae IBCB Ma03, showed positive efficacy for the P. lilacinum (> 90 %) and M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04 (85 %) isolates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 1, all isolates except Ma03 significantly reduced the final nematode population.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
final population of M. incognitae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
except M. anisopliae IBCB Ma03e0
Comparator
inoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 162 days after sowing, all treatments significantly reduced the final population of M. incognita, except M. anisopliae IBCB Ma03.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–760 · show in text ↑
e1

“one inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. lilacinum IBCB Pl06 gave a reproduction factor below 1 and efficacy near 80%.

Treatment
P. lilacinum IBCB Pl06e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
P. lilacinum IBCB Pl06Purpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
reproduction factorse0
Direction
belowe0
Value
1e0
Qualifier
efficiency close to 80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P. lilacinum IBCB Pl06 and M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04 isolates were the most effective, with reproduction factors below 1 and efficiency close to 80 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in cotton1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04 gave a reproduction factor below 1 and efficacy near 80%.

Treatment
M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04Metarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
reproduction factorse0
Direction
belowe0
Value
1e0
Qualifier
efficiency close to 80 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The P. lilacinum IBCB Pl06 and M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04 isolates were the most effective, with reproduction factors below 1 and efficiency close to 80 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in cotton1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 2, only IBCB Pl06 differed from the control for final nematode population.

Treatment
IBCB Pl06 isolatee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
final population variablee0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 97 days, only the IBCB Pl06 isolate differed from the control in the final population variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in cotton1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 2, P. lilacinum isolates showed over 90% efficacy.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
P. lilacinumPurpureocillium lilacinume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
positive efficacy for the P. lilacinume0
Value
> 90 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Purpureocillium lilacinum · Second interactorAuthor not explicitly stated. Article is by Jeanne Carey, Ron D’Amico, Deanna A. Sutton, and Michael G. Rinald · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all tested isolates, except M. anisopliae IBCB Ma03, showed positive efficacy for the P. lilacinum (> 90 %) and M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04 (85 %) isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in cotton1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In experiment 2, Ma04 showed 85% efficacy.

Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Second interactor
M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04Metarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04e0
Value
85 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. anisopliae IBCB Ma04 (85 %) isolates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita race 3 in cotton1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–131 · show in text ↑