Paper · 2025 · Plant Production Science

Evaluation of relay intercropping hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth) as a green manure to reduce chemical fertilizer input in the cultivation of root crops

Wakana Nakao; Hiroyuki Daimon; Atsushi Matsumura

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Producing cash and green manure crops during the same growing season is a promising strategy for sustainable crop production. The present study evaluated the relay intercropping of a legume green manure crop (Vicia villosa Roth, hairy vetch) and root crops (radish and carrot). The hairy vetch was interseeded approximately 40 d after root crop seeding. Competitive effects were not observed in the production of either root crop, even when relay intercropped with hairy vetch. The biomass production of hairy vetch ranged from 376–990 kg DW 10a−1, and the biomass and nutrient (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) accumulation of hairy vetch relay intercropped with carrot were significantly higher than those of radish. The fertilizer effects of hairy vetch incorporation obtained by relay intercropping were compared with those of conventional chemical fertilizer input in subsequent crop production (vegetable soybean and sweet corn). The yield of vegetable soybean was maintained at the same level as that of chemical fertilizer, even when cultivated with hairy vetch alone. In the sweet corn, although hairy vetch alone could not provide sufficient nutrients and growth was inferior compared to chemical fertilizers, the incorporation of hairy vetch relay intercropped with carrot showed relatively higher fertilizer effects and significant difference in ear weight was not observed with chemical fertilizer. Our results show the possibility of reducing chemical fertilizer input in succeeding crop production by hairy vetch relay intercropped with root crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch relay intercropping showed no competitive effect on radish production.

Treatment
relay intercropped with hairy vetche0
Outcome
Competitive effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competitive effects were not observed in the production of either root crop, even when relay intercropped with hairy vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“root crops (radish and carrot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch relay intercropping showed no competitive effect on carrot production.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae1
Treatment
relay intercropped with hairy vetche0
Outcome
Competitive effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Competitive effects were not observed in the production of either root crop, even when relay intercropped with hairy vetch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“root crops (radish and carrot)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–276 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch biomass ranged from 376–990 kg DW 10a−1.

Taxon
hairy vetchVicia villosae0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Value
376–990 kg DW 10a−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass production of hairy vetch ranged from 376–990 kg DW 10a−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–547 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch biomass and nutrient accumulation were higher with carrot than radish.

Taxon
hairy vetchVicia villosae0
Treatment
relay intercropped with carrote0
Outcome
biomass and nutrient (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
radishe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa
Vicia villosa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biomass and nutrient (nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) accumulation of hairy vetch relay intercropped with carrot were significantly higher than those of radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetable soybean yield with hairy vetch alone matched chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
vegetable soybeane0
Treatment
hairy vetch alonee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maintained at the same levele0
Comparator
chemical fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of vegetable soybean was maintained at the same level as that of chemical fertilizer, even when cultivated with hairy vetch alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn growth was inferior with hairy vetch alone versus chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
hairy vetch alonee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
chemical fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“hairy vetch alone could not provide sufficient nutrients and growth was inferior compared to chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1222 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch relay intercropped with carrot had relatively higher fertilizer effects in sweet corn.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
incorporation of hairy vetch relay intercropped with carrote0
Outcome
fertilizer effectse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the incorporation of hairy vetch relay intercropped with carrot showed relatively higher fertilizer effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1098 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn ear weight did not differ significantly between carrot-intercropped vetch and chemical fertilizer.

Taxon
sweet corne1
Treatment
hairy vetch relay intercropped with carrote0
Outcome
ear weighte0
Comparator
chemical fertilizere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the incorporation of hairy vetch relay intercropped with carrot showed relatively higher fertilizer effects and significant difference in ear weight was not observed with chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1414 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1098 · show in text ↑

Daucus carota · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Vicia villosa · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Vicia villosa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.