Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Combined application of biochar and halophyte intercropping enhances cucumber yield and quality by ameliorating soil properties in a continuous cropping system

Songsong Shen; Yusheng Xu; Zhongpeng Liu; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biochar amendment and halophyte intercropping are viable strategies for alleviating soil degradation in greenhouse systems, specifically the secondary salinization and autotoxicity induced by continuous cropping. Nevertheless, the potential synergistic effects of combining these practices remain poorly understood. This study investigated their synergistic effects on soil properties, microbial communities, and cucumber performance. A pot experiment was conducted with the following treatments: soil without amendment (CK), biochar (B), Paspalum vaginatum intercropping (S), and biochar combined with Paspalum vaginatum intercropping. The results showed that BS treatment led to the highest increases in soil organic carbon content, pH, total nitrogen content, available phosphorus content, and available potassium content compared to CK (p<0.05). Concurrently, BS significantly reduced available nitrogen, electrical conductivity, Na + , SO 4 2- , and Cl - levels, while total phosphorus remained unaffected. Cucumber yield increased significantly by 11.50% and 27.12% under B and BS treatments, respectively, whereas S showed no significant effect. BS also achieved the highest fruit quality enhancement, followed by B and S. Notably, B and S treatments displayed the highest and lowest K + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ accumulation, respectively, whereas the BS treatment led to K + and Ca 2+ concentrations that were significantly lower than those in the B treatment. Soil bacterial diversity was significantly enhanced under BS. The PLS-PM identified the alleviation of soil salinity and acidity, along with improved nutrient availability, as the primary drivers for enhanced crop performance, with soil bacterial diversity playing a secondary yet significant role. These findings suggest that biochar combined with intercropping (BS) effectively mitigates continuous cropping obstacles in greenhouse systems by synergistically improving soil health and microbial ecology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased soil organic carbon, pH, total nitrogen, available phosphorus and potassium most.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
BS treatmente0
Outcome
soil organic carbon content, pH, total nitrogen contente0
Direction
highest increasese0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BS treatment led to the highest increases in soil organic carbon content, pH, total nitrogen content, available phosphorus content, and available potassium content compared to CK (p<0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced available nitrogen, conductivity and three ions.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
BSe0
Outcome
available nitrogen, electrical conductivity, Na +e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BS significantly reduced available nitrogen, electrical conductivity, Na + , SO 4 2- , and Cl - levels, while total phosphorus remained unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phosphorus was unaffected under combined treatment.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
BSe0
Outcome
total phosphoruse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BS significantly reduced available nitrogen, electrical conductivity, Na + , SO 4 2- , and Cl - levels, while total phosphorus remained unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased cucumber yield by 11.50%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber yield increased significantly by 11.50% and 27.12% under B and BS treatments, respectively, whereas S showed no significant effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased cucumber yield by 27.12%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
BSe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber yield increased significantly by 11.50% and 27.12% under B and BS treatments, respectively, whereas S showed no significant effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping alone had no significant yield effect.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Se0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber yield increased significantly by 11.50% and 27.12% under B and BS treatments, respectively, whereas S showed no significant effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment produced the greatest fruit quality enhancement.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
BSe0
Outcome
fruit quality enhancemente0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
B and Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BS also achieved the highest fruit quality enhancement, followed by B and S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar alone gave highest potassium, calcium and magnesium accumulation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
K + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B and S treatments displayed the highest and lowest K + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ accumulation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping alone gave lowest potassium, calcium and magnesium accumulation.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Se0
Outcome
K + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ accumulatione0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B and S treatments displayed the highest and lowest K + , Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ accumulation, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment had lower potassium and calcium concentrations than biochar alone.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
BS treatmente0
Outcome
K + and Ca 2+ concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
B treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BS treatment led to K + and Ca 2+ concentrations that were significantly lower than those in the B treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment enhanced soil bacterial diversity.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
BSe0
Outcome
Soil bacterial diversitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil bacterial diversity was significantly enhanced under BS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1524 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modeling identified salinity, acidity and nutrient availability as principal drivers of crop performance.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
improved nutrient availabilitye0
Outcome
crop performancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
soil salinity and aciditye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PLS-PM identified the alleviation of soil salinity and acidity, along with improved nutrient availability, as the primary drivers for enhanced crop performance, with soil bacterial diversity playing a secondary yet significant role.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bacterial diversity played a secondary but significant role in enhanced crop performance.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
soil bacterial diversitye0
Outcome
soil bacterial diversitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with soil bacterial diversity playing a secondary yet significant role.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1761 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–77 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

boron atom · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.