Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Approaches to organic sweet potato cultivation: managing nematodes, pests, and soil health with winter cover crops and biopesticides

Claire M. Schloemer; Scott H. Graham; Koon-Hui Wang; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The growing demand for organic sweet potato production underscores the need for sustainable pest management and soil health strategies. This study evaluated six winter cover crop systems followed by summer sweet potato, with and without biopesticide applications, to manage Meloidogyne incognita and insect pests while assessing soil health indicators. Marketable yield was the highest after wheat (20,679 kg/ha), exceeding the fallow treatment by >2,000 kg/ha. Biopesticide use further increased yield (+700 kg/ha), reduced insect damage by 36%–40% ( p ≤ 0.05), and enhanced crop value by $33/ha. At planting, M. incognita densities were similar across treatments, but by midseason, they were the lowest following rye. Wireworm damage did not vary by cover crop, although biopesticides provided significant protection. Cover crops also shaped nematode communities, with crimson clover, wheat, and mixed systems supporting higher structural index values later in the season, while enrichment index and fungi to bacteria ratios remained unchanged. Soil microbial respiration peaked at planting, especially after wheat and the cover crop mix, and microbial biomass increased across all cover crop treatments, with rye supporting the highest growth. Radish and wheat showed trends toward lower M. incognita populations and greater economic returns, although the effects were not statistically significant. Canonical correspondence analysis revealed nematode communities, microbial abundance, and soil CO 2 flux as key drivers of yield. In 2022, yield was negatively associated with M. incognita but positively correlated with fungi to bacteria and Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria (GP: GN) ratios; by 2023, yield was instead negatively associated with fungivorous nematodes and microbial respiration and positively associated with protozoa biomass and protozoa to bacteria ratios. Overall, combining cover crops with biopesticides improved yield, reduced pest pressure, and enhanced soil biological function, demonstrating a promising strategy for sustainable organic sweet potato production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable sweet potato yield was highest after wheat, exceeding the fallow treatment by more than 2,000 kg/ha.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
after wheate1
Outcome
Marketable yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
20,679 kg/hae1
Comparator
fallow treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Marketable yield was the highest after wheat (20,679 kg/ha), exceeding the fallow treatment by >2,000 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide use increased sweet potato yield by 700 kg/ha.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Biopesticide usee2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
+700 kg/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biopesticide use further increased yield (+700 kg/ha), reduced insect damage by 36%–40% ( p ≤ 0.05), and enhanced crop value by $33/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide use reduced insect damage in sweet potato by 36%–40% (p ≤ 0.05).

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Biopesticide usee2
Outcome
insect damagee2
Direction
reducede2
Value
36%–40%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biopesticide use further increased yield (+700 kg/ha), reduced insect damage by 36%–40% ( p ≤ 0.05), and enhanced crop value by $33/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide use enhanced sweet potato crop value by $33/ha.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Biopesticide usee2
Outcome
crop valuee2
Direction
enhancede2
Value
$33/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e2

“Biopesticide use further increased yield (+700 kg/ha), reduced insect damage by 36%–40% ( p ≤ 0.05), and enhanced crop value by $33/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–596 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wireworm damage in sweet potato did not vary by cover crop.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Interactor
Wireworme3pest
Outcome
Wireworm damagee3
Direction
did not varye3
Qualifier
by cover crope3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“Wireworm damage did not vary by cover crop, although biopesticides provided significant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticides gave significant protection against wireworm damage in sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
biopesticidese3
Interactor
Wireworme3pest
Outcome
protectione3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“Wireworm damage did not vary by cover crop, although biopesticides provided significant protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By midseason, Meloidogyne incognita densities in sweet potato were lowest following rye.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
ryee4
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Outcome
M. incognita densitiese4
Direction
loweste4
Qualifier
by midseasone4
Comparator
across treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“At planting, M. incognita densities were similar across treatments, but by midseason, they were the lowest following rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At planting, M. incognita densities in sweet potato were similar across cover crop treatments.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae4pest
Outcome
M. incognita densitiese4
Direction
similare4
Qualifier
At plantinge4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“At planting, M. incognita densities were similar across treatments, but by midseason, they were the lowest following rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crimson clover, wheat and mixed cover crop systems supported higher nematode structural index values later in the season in sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
crimson clover, wheat, and mixed systemse5
Outcome
structural index valuese5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
later in the seasone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e5

“Cover crops also shaped nematode communities, with crimson clover, wheat, and mixed systems supporting higher structural index values later in the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–973 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enrichment index and fungi to bacteria ratios in sweet potato soil remained unchanged across cover crops.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
enrichment index and fungi to bacteria ratiose6
Direction
remained unchangede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e6

“enrichment index and fungi to bacteria ratios remained unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1045 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial respiration in sweet potato systems peaked at planting.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
Soil microbial respiratione7
Direction
peakede7
Qualifier
at plantinge7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil microbial respiration peaked at planting, especially after wheat and the cover crop mix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial biomass increased across all cover crop treatments in sweet potato systems.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
cover crop treatmentse1
Outcome
microbial biomasse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“microbial biomass increased across all cover crop treatments, with rye supporting the highest growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye supported the highest microbial biomass growth in sweet potato systems.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
ryee1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
microbial biomasse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“microbial biomass increased across all cover crop treatments, with rye supporting the highest growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish and wheat showed a non-significant trend toward lower M. incognita populations in sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Radish and wheate1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
M. incognita populationse1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radish and wheat showed trends toward lower M. incognita populations and greater economic returns, although the effects were not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish and wheat showed a non-significant trend toward greater economic returns in sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Radish and wheate1
Outcome
economic returnse1
Direction
greatere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radish and wheat showed trends toward lower M. incognita populations and greater economic returns, although the effects were not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1401 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canonical correspondence analysis identified nematode communities, microbial abundance and soil CO2 flux as key drivers of sweet potato yield.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
nematode communities, microbial abundance, and soil CO 2 fluxe1
Outcome
yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canonical correspondence analysis revealed nematode communities, microbial abundance, and soil CO 2 flux as key drivers of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1531 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2022, sweet potato yield was negatively associated with M. incognita.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
negatively associatede1
Setting
In 2022e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2022, yield was negatively associated with M. incognita but positively correlated with fungi to bacteria and Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria (GP: GN) ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1700 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2022, sweet potato yield was positively correlated with fungi to bacteria and Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria ratios.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
fungi to bacteria and Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria (GP: GN) ratiose1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
positively correlatede1
Setting
In 2022e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2022, yield was negatively associated with M. incognita but positively correlated with fungi to bacteria and Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteria (GP: GN) ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1700 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 2023, sweet potato yield was negatively associated with fungivorous nematodes.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Interactor
fungivorous nematodese1other
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
negatively associatede1
Setting
by 2023e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“by 2023, yield was instead negatively associated with fungivorous nematodes and microbial respiration and positively associated with protozoa biomass and protozoa to bacteria ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1883 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By 2023, sweet potato yield was positively associated with protozoa biomass and protozoa to bacteria ratios.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
protozoa biomass and protozoa to bacteria ratiose1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
positively associatede1
Setting
by 2023e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“organic sweet potato cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“by 2023, yield was instead negatively associated with fungivorous nematodes and microbial respiration and positively associated with protozoa biomass and protozoa to bacteria ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1883 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · pest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.