Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Effects of Different Sod-Seeding Patterns on Soil Properties, Nitrogen Cycle Genes, and N2O Mitigation in Peach Orchards

Zhuo Pang; Yufeng Li; Hengkang Xu; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To clarify the role and mechanism of sod-seeding patterns in improving soil fertility and mitigating nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in peach orchards, we conducted a study since 2023. Taking clean tillage (CK) as the control, three sod-seeding patterns—Trifolium repens–Lolium perenne mixed sowing (TPr), T. repens single sowing (Tr), and L. perenne single sowing (Pr)—were tested to analyze soil physicochemical properties, nitrogen cycle functional genes, and N2O emission-related genes, and to explore the driving mechanism of N2O mitigation. Results showed that all three sod-seeding patterns significantly reduced soil pH and bulk density, increased soil electrical conductivity and mean aggregate size, and improved soil nutrient status compared with CK; TPr performed best, significantly enhancing soil enzyme activities related to carbon and nitrogen cycles. Sod-seeding patterns had no significant effect on genes involved in assimilatory nitrate reduction, denitrification, or nitrification, but significantly increased dissimilatory nitrate reduction (DNRA) and nitrogen degradation gene abundances, and reduced N2O-producing gene (amoA + amoB, nirS + nirK) abundances. Field monitoring indicated TPr reduced N2O emissions by 34.0%, 35.7%, and 41.0%, relative to CK, Pr, and Tr, respectively. Structural equation modeling revealed that sod-seeding reduced N2O emissions mainly by decreasing soil NH4+-N content and nirS + nirK abundance. In conclusion, sod-seeding patterns improve soil fertility and mitigate N2O emissions in peach orchards, with TPr showing the best comprehensive benefits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three sod-seeding patterns significantly reduced soil pH and bulk density compared with clean tillage.

Treatment
sod-seeding patternse0
Outcome
soil pH and bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“all three sod-seeding patterns significantly reduced soil pH and bulk density, increased soil electrical conductivity and mean aggregate size, and improved soil nutrient status compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sod-seeding patterns increased soil electrical conductivity and mean aggregate size compared with clean tillage.

Treatment
sod-seeding patternse0
Outcome
soil electrical conductivity and mean aggregate sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“all three sod-seeding patterns significantly reduced soil pH and bulk density, increased soil electrical conductivity and mean aggregate size, and improved soil nutrient status compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sod-seeding patterns improved soil nutrient status compared with clean tillage.

Treatment
sod-seeding patternse0
Outcome
soil nutrient statuse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“all three sod-seeding patterns significantly reduced soil pH and bulk density, increased soil electrical conductivity and mean aggregate size, and improved soil nutrient status compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The TPr pattern significantly enhanced soil enzyme activities related to carbon and nitrogen cycles.

Treatment
TPre1
Outcome
soil enzyme activities related to carbon and nitrogen cyclese1
Direction
enhancinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“TPr performed best, significantly enhancing soil enzyme activities related to carbon and nitrogen cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sod-seeding patterns had no significant effect on genes for assimilatory nitrate reduction, denitrification or nitrification.

Treatment
Sod-seeding patternse2
Outcome
genes involved in assimilatory nitrate reduction, denitrification, or nitrificatione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sod-seeding patterns had no significant effect on genes involved in assimilatory nitrate reduction, denitrification, or nitrification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sod-seeding patterns significantly increased DNRA and nitrogen degradation gene abundances.

Treatment
Sod-seeding patternse2
Outcome
dissimilatory nitrate reduction (DNRA) and nitrogen degradation gene abundancese3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sod-seeding patterns had no significant effect on genes involved in assimilatory nitrate reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–964 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly increased dissimilatory nitrate reduction (DNRA) and nitrogen degradation gene abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sod-seeding patterns reduced abundances of N2O-producing genes amoA + amoB and nirS + nirK.

Treatment
Sod-seeding patternse2
Gene
amoA + amoB, nirS + nirKe4
Outcome
N2O-producing genee4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sod-seeding patterns had no significant effect on genes involved in assimilatory nitrate reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–964 · show in text ↑
e4

“reduced N2O-producing gene (amoA + amoB, nirS + nirK) abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TPr reduced N2O emissions by 34.0% relative to clean tillage.

Treatment
TPre5
Outcome
N2O emissionse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
34.0%e5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“TPr reduced N2O emissions by 34.0%, 35.7%, and 41.0%, relative to CK, Pr, and Tr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TPr reduced N2O emissions by 35.7% relative to the Pr pattern.

Treatment
TPre5
Outcome
N2O emissionse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
35.7%e5
Comparator
Pre5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“TPr reduced N2O emissions by 34.0%, 35.7%, and 41.0%, relative to CK, Pr, and Tr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TPr reduced N2O emissions by 41.0% relative to the Tr pattern.

Treatment
TPre5
Outcome
N2O emissionse5
Direction
reducede5
Value
41.0%e5
Comparator
Tre5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“TPr reduced N2O emissions by 34.0%, 35.7%, and 41.0%, relative to CK, Pr, and Tr, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1301 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Structural equation modeling indicates sod-seeding reduced N2O emissions mainly through lower soil NH4+-N and nirS + nirK abundance.

Treatment
sod-seedinge6
Gene
nirS + nirKe6
Compound
NH4+-Ne6
Outcome
N2O emissionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e6

“Structural equation modeling revealed that sod-seeding reduced N2O emissions mainly by decreasing soil NH4+-N content and nirS + nirK abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1446 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TPr showed the best comprehensive benefits among the sod-seeding patterns in peach orchards.

Treatment
TPre7
Outcome
best comprehensive benefitse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“Peach Orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–120 · show in text ↑
e7

“TPr showing the best comprehensive benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1601 · show in text ↑