Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Impact of tillage and weed management strategies on growth, physiology and yield of summer black gram and soil microbial populations

T Jagruti; S Prabhasmita; K P Kaushik; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, during the summer of 2024 to evaluate the impact of different tillage and weed management practices on black gram (BG). The study was comprised of four tillage practices, namely conventional tillage (CT), zero tillage (ZT), CT with residue (R) (CT+R) and ZT with residue (ZT+R) in the main plots and three weed management practices, namely H1 (application of pendimethalin at 750 g ha-1 followed by imazethapyr at 70 g ha-1), H2 (H1 + one hand weeding) and H3 (weedy check) in sub-plots, laid out in a split plot design with three replications. Various morphological, physiological, biochemical, yield parameters and soil microbial populations were studied at different growth stages of black gram. The results revealed that CT+R recorded the most significant positive effects on growth, physiological, biochemical and yield parameters, outperforming ZT in many aspects. Weed management practices, particularly H2, enhanced crop performance by reducing weed interference. Notably, CT+R increased the total chlorophyll content by 35 % over ZT, while H2 increased it by 34.2 % compared to H3. Overall, the combination of CT +R and H2 gave the maximum seed yield (1195.67 kg ha-1), whereas the lowest yield (577.7 kg ha-1) was recorded under ZT with H3. Thus, CT+R combined with H2 is recommended for optimizing the seed yield of black gram under summer conditions of Odisha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with residue improved growth, physiology, biochemistry and yield over zero tillage.

Treatment
CT+Re0
Outcome
growth, physiological, biochemical and yield parameterse0
Direction
outperforminge0
Comparator
ZTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“CT+R recorded the most significant positive effects on growth, physiological, biochemical and yield parameters, outperforming ZT in many aspects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2 improved crop performance by reducing weed interference.

Treatment
H2e0
Outcome
crop performancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
reducing weed interferencee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management practices, particularly H2, enhanced crop performance by reducing weed interference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1084 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT+R increased total chlorophyll content by 35% relative to ZT.

Treatment
CT+Re0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35 %e0
Comparator
ZTe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“CT+R increased the total chlorophyll content by 35 % over ZT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2 increased total chlorophyll content by 34.2% relative to H3.

Treatment
H2e0
Outcome
ite0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.2 %e0
Comparator
H3e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“H2 increased it by 34.2 % compared to H3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CT+R with H2 produced the maximum seed yield of 1195.67 kg ha-1.

Treatment
CT +R and H2e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1195.67 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
ZT with H3e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of CT +R and H2 gave the maximum seed yield (1195.67 kg ha-1), whereas the lowest yield (577.7 kg ha-1) was recorded under ZT with H3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZT with H3 produced the lowest yield of 577.7 kg ha-1.

Treatment
ZT with H3e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
577.7 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest yield (577.7 kg ha-1) was recorded under ZT with H3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1362 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend CT+R with H2 to optimize summer black gram seed yield in Odisha.

Taxon
black gramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
CT+R combined with H2e0
Outcome
optimizing the seed yielde0
Setting
Odishae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT+R combined with H2 is recommended for optimizing the seed yield of black gram under summer conditions of Odisha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1485 · show in text ↑