Abstract
The present work was carried out at Ali Ben Aby Taleb village in Nubaria region near Alexandria during 2004 and 2005 seasons. In the first season, the study was concerned with survey of pests infesting the oil-seed plants [Sesame, Sunflower and Earthnut], and determination of the common harmful pests of each plant. These pests are Aphis gossypii Glov., Empoaseca decipiens, Paoli., Bemisia tabaci (Genn), Tetranychus urticae Koch., Campylomma nicolasi Pt. and Antigastra catalnavalis (Dip.) for sesame. Myzus persicae (Sulz.), Empoaseca decipiens, and Bemisia tabaci were also collected for sunflower, and Empoaseca decipiens, Bemisia tabaci, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and Tetranychus urticae for Earthnut. In the second season studies were performed a) To determine the effect of three sowing dates and four levels of irrigation on insect infestation of sesame plant. The dates of sowing were April 25, May 15, and June 5 and the levels of irrigations were weekly, every two weeks, every 3 weeks, and every 4 weeks. b) To follow the effects of three levels of urate fertilizers added at different dates on insect infestation of sesame.The levels of nitrogen were 15, 30 and 45 kg/feddan and the addition of fertilizer was practiced during thinning, flowering and during both thinning and flowering. The results showed significant differences between the effects of various dates of sowing with regard to the infestation of four insect pests to sesame plants. However, irrigation regime did not significantly reduce the incidence of infestation of the four insect pests on sesame plants. The fertilizer levels a significantly raised the infestation with the leafhopper, whereas the other three insect pests were not affected. In the mean time, there were also significant differences between the effects of dates of adding the fertilizer with the Aphid only. Meanwhile there were no significant differences for the other three insects.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Six insect pests were recorded on sesame.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicume0 - Outcome
- These pests are Aphis gossypii Glov., Empoaseca decipiens, Paoli., Bemisia tabaci (Genn), Tetranychus urticae Koch., Campylomma nicolasi Pt. and Antigastra catalnavalis (Dip.)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These pests are Aphis gossypii Glov., Empoaseca decipiens, Paoli., Bemisia tabaci (Genn), Tetranychus urticae Koch., Campylomma nicolasi Pt. and Antigastra catalnavalis (Dip.) for sesame”
Claim · model-written summary
Three insect pests were collected from sunflower.
- Taxon
- sunflower
Helianthus annuuse0 - Outcome
- Myzus persicae (Sulz.), Empoaseca decipiens, and Bemisia tabaci were also collectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Myzus persicae (Sulz.), Empoaseca decipiens, and Bemisia tabaci were also collected for sunflower”
Claim · model-written summary
Four insect pests were recorded on Earthnut.
- Taxon
- Earthnut
Bunium bulbocastanume0 - Outcome
- Empoaseca decipiens, Bemisia tabaci, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and Tetranychus urticaee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Empoaseca decipiens, Bemisia tabaci, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) and Tetranychus urticae for Earthnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing dates differed significantly in sesame infestation by four insect pests.
- Taxon
- sesameSesamum indicume0
- Treatment
- various dates of sowinge0
- Outcome
- infestation of four insect pestse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significant differences between the effects of various dates of sowing with regard to the infestation of four insect pests to sesame plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation regime did not significantly reduce sesame infestation by four insect pests.
- Taxon
- sesameSesamum indicume0
- Treatment
- irrigation regimee0
- Outcome
- incidence of infestation of the four insect pestse0
- Direction
- did not significantly reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation regime did not significantly reduce the incidence of infestation of the four insect pests on sesame plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer levels significantly raised leafhopper infestation.
- Treatment
- fertilizer levelse0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere0pest
- Outcome
- infestation with the leafhoppere0
- Direction
- raisede0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“fertilizer levels a significantly raised the infestation with the leafhopper”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer levels did not affect the other three insect pests.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“whereas the other three insect pests were not affected”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer application dates differed significantly in aphid infestation.
Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“significant differences between the effects of dates of adding the fertilizer with the Aphid only”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer application dates did not significantly differ for the other three insects.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“there were no significant differences for the other three insects”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · disease · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.