Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

A Comparative Study on the Effect of Biogas Residue Soil Conditioner on Dryland Maize

Jing Zhou; Xiuhong Wang; Baoping Wang; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To investigate the adaptability and efficacy of biogas residue soil conditioner in conjunction with other commercially available soil conditioners in arid conditions, a study was conducted using dryland maize as the experimental crop. Five treatments were implemented based on the “dry sowing and wet emergence” method for Xinjiang cotton: T1 with traditional fertilization, T2 with biogas residue soil conditioner, T3 with biogas residue soil conditioner and endophytic arbuscular mycorrhizal bacteria, T4 with commercial Fuli Bang soil conditioner, and T5 with commercial Tianji soil conditioner. Results indicated that the combined use of biogas residue particulate soil conditioner and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (T3) had the most positive effects. T3 treatment reduced soil bulk density, increased soil organic matter content, and enhanced rhizosphere microbial diversity. Compared to T1, T3 led to a decrease in soil bulk density by 8.89%, higher microbial diversity indices, and significant increases in plant height, stem diameter, and yield by 6.25%, 15.48%, and 37.43%, respectively. Moreover, T3 showed elevated antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD and POD) and lower malondialdehyde content, indicating enhanced stress resilience and root activity. T3 showed ideal balance in yield, aboveground growth, and root stress resilience. It also improved soil organic matter levels and structure, highlighting the significant potential of combining biogas residue soil conditioner and endophytic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to alleviate spring drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 reduced soil bulk density.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3 treatmente0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T3 treatment reduced soil bulk density, increased soil organic matter content, and enhanced rhizosphere microbial diversity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 increased soil organic matter content.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3 treatmente0
Outcome
soil organic matter contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T3 treatment reduced soil bulk density, increased soil organic matter content, and enhanced rhizosphere microbial diversity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 enhanced rhizosphere microbial diversity.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3 treatmente0
Outcome
rhizosphere microbial diversitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T3 treatment reduced soil bulk density, increased soil organic matter content, and enhanced rhizosphere microbial diversity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to T1, T3 changed soil bulk density by 8.89%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
8.89%e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to T1, T3 led to a decrease in soil bulk density by 8.89%, higher microbial diversity indices, and significant increases in plant height, stem diameter, and yield by 6.25%, 15.48%, and 37.43%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to T1, T3 changed plant height by 6.25%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
6.25%e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to T1, T3 led to a decrease in soil bulk density by 8.89%, higher microbial diversity indices, and significant increases in plant height, stem diameter, and yield by 6.25%, 15.48%, and 37.43%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to T1, T3 changed stem diameter by 15.48%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasese0
Value
15.48%e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to T1, T3 led to a decrease in soil bulk density by 8.89%, higher microbial diversity indices, and significant increases in plant height, stem diameter, and yield by 6.25%, 15.48%, and 37.43%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to T1, T3 changed yield by 37.43%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
37.43%e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to T1, T3 led to a decrease in soil bulk density by 8.89%, higher microbial diversity indices, and significant increases in plant height, stem diameter, and yield by 6.25%, 15.48%, and 37.43%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 produced higher microbial diversity indices than T1.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
microbial diversity indicese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to T1, T3 led to a decrease in soil bulk density by 8.89%, higher microbial diversity indices, and significant increases in plant height, stem diameter, and yield by 6.25%, 15.48%, and 37.43%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 elevated SOD and POD antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Gene
SOD and PODe0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, T3 showed elevated antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD and POD) and lower malondialdehyde content, indicating enhanced stress resilience and root activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 lowered malondialdehyde content.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
malondialdehyde contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, T3 showed elevated antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD and POD) and lower malondialdehyde content, indicating enhanced stress resilience and root activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined conditioner and fungi improved soil organic matter levels and structure.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
combining biogas residue soil conditioner and endophytic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0
Interactor
endophytic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
soil organic matter levels and structuree0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also improved soil organic matter levels and structure, highlighting the significant potential of combining biogas residue soil conditioner and endophytic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to alleviate spring drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dryland Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.