Paper · 1999 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

In-situ conservation of residual soil moisture through tillage and mulch for maize (Zea mays) in tropical Bay Islands

S. C. Pramanik

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during dry season (December-April) of 1994-95 and 1995-96 to study the effect of tillage (conventional and minimum) and mulching (rice straw, saw dust, coir dust and rice husk) on the growth, yield, moisture stress index and water use of maize (Zea mays L.) in the humid tropical climate of Bay Islands. The minimum tillage and conventional tillage were at par in respect of yield, crop growth and water-use. Among the various mulches, rice straw gave 52.11 % higher maize yield compared to the control. The yield increase was due to better crop growth parameters, improvement in moisture-stress indices, efficient root development, conservation of more amount of residual soil-moisture in the crop root zone and higher water-use efficiency. The coir dust and saw dust were next important materials bringing 47.59 and 46.77% higher maize yield than the unmulched plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum and conventional tillage gave comparable maize yield, growth and water use.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
minimum tillagee1
Outcome
yield, crop growth and water-usee1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–290 · show in text ↑
e1

“The minimum tillage and conventional tillage were at par in respect of yield, crop growth and water-use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch raised maize yield 52.11% over control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
rice strawe0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
52.11 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice straw gave 52.11 % higher maize yield compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–536 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw yield gains were attributed to better crop growth parameters.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
yield increasee0
Qualifier
better crop growth parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increase was due to better crop growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–596 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–290 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw yield gains were attributed to improved moisture stress indices and root development.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
yield increasee0
Qualifier
improvement in moisture-stress indices, efficient root developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increase was due to better crop growth parameters, improvement in moisture-stress indices, efficient root development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–290 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw yield gains were attributed to residual soil moisture conservation and higher water use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
yield increasee0
Qualifier
conservation of more amount of residual soil-moisture in the crop root zone and higher water-use efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increase was due to better crop growth parameters, improvement in moisture-stress indices, efficient root development, conservation of more amount of residual soil-moisture in the crop root zone and higher water-use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–774 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coir dust mulch raised maize yield 47.59% above unmulched plots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
coir duste0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
47.59e0
Comparator
unmulched plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coir dust and saw dust were next important materials bringing 47.59 and 46.77% higher maize yield than the unmulched plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saw dust mulch raised maize yield 46.77% above unmulched plots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
saw duste0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
46.77%e0
Comparator
unmulched plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The coir dust and saw dust were next important materials bringing 47.59 and 46.77% higher maize yield than the unmulched plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–902 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 63 positive, 3 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

growing medium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

tillage · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 75 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.