Paper · 1997 · Biologia Plantarum

Effect of salinity on chlorophyll and proline contents in three aquatic macrophytes

N.P. Rout; S.B. Tripathi; B.P. Shaw

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The role of proline in imparting tolerance to salinity was investigated in Hydrilla verticillata, Najas indica and Najas gramenia. The plants were exposed to different concentrations of NaCl and artificial sea water (SWS) separately. The chlorophyll (Chl) a/b ratio decreased significantly in all the three plant species in both NaCl and SWS treatments, comparatively more in former than the latter. NaCl resulted in drastic decrease in this ratio in salt sensitive H. verticillata and N. indica, but in somewhat lesser decrease in salt resistant N. gramenia. Proline content increased at both NaCl and SWS treatments, especially at the latter. However, in H. verticillata proline content at 1.5 and 2.5 % NaCl decreased. It was concluded that proline cannot be used as a biochemical marker of salt tolerance in aquatic plants, however, the decrease in Chl a/b ratio in response to NaCl may be used as an index of salt sensitivity in this ecological group of plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl and artificial sea water significantly decreased the chlorophyll a/b ratio in all three species, more under NaCl.

Taxon
Hydrilla verticillata, Najas indica and Najas grameniae1
Treatment
NaCl and SWS treatmentse0
Outcome
chlorophyll (Chl) a/b ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll (Chl) a/b ratio decreased significantly in all the three plant species in both NaCl and SWS treatments, comparatively more in former than the latter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hydrilla verticillata, Najas indica and Najas gramenia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl caused a drastic chlorophyll ratio decrease in salt sensitive H. verticillata and N. indica.

Taxon
H. verticillata and N. indicaHydrilla verticillataNajas indicae0
Treatment
NaCle0
Outcome
this ratioe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrilla verticillata
Hydrilla verticillata · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Najas indica
Najas indica · TaxonRuppia2000 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NaCl resulted in drastic decrease in this ratio in salt sensitive H. verticillata and N. indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl caused a lesser chlorophyll ratio decrease in salt resistant N. gramenia.

Taxon
N. grameniae0
Treatment
NaCle1
Outcome
this ratioe1
Direction
lesser decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but in somewhat lesser decrease in salt resistant N. gramenia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–559 · show in text ↑
e1

“NaCl resulted in drastic decrease in this ratio in salt sensitive H. verticillata and N. indica, but in somewhat lesser decrease in salt resistant N. gramenia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content increased under NaCl and SWS, especially SWS.

Taxon
Hydrilla verticillata, Najas indica and Najas grameniae1
Treatment
NaCl and SWS treatmentse0
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content increased at both NaCl and SWS treatments, especially at the latter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–644 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hydrilla verticillata, Najas indica and Najas gramenia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.5 and 2.5 % NaCl, H. verticillata proline content decreased.

Taxon
H. verticillataHydrilla verticillatae0
Treatment
1.5 and 2.5 % NaCle0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrilla verticillata
Hydrilla verticillata · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in H. verticillata proline content at 1.5 and 2.5 % NaCl decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–721 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that proline is unsuitable as a biochemical marker of salt tolerance.

Taxon
aquatic plantse0
Outcome
proline cannot be used as a biochemical marker of salt tolerancee0

Verbatim

e0

“proline cannot be used as a biochemical marker of salt tolerance in aquatic plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–826 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed NaCl-associated chlorophyll ratio decrease as an index of salt sensitivity.

Taxon
aquatic plantse1
Outcome
decrease in Chl a/b ratio in response to NaCl may be used as an index of salt sensitivitye0

Verbatim

e0

“the decrease in Chl a/b ratio in response to NaCl may be used as an index of salt sensitivity in this ecological group of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“aquatic plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–826 · show in text ↑