Paper · 1990 · Weed Technology

Effect of Seeding Depth, Herbicide, and Variety on Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) Emergence, Vigor, and Yield

Robert G. Wilson; John A. Smith; C. Dean Yonts

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Preplant applied herbicides were compared for their effect on three varieties of sugarbeets when seeds were planted at six depths during 1987 through 1989. More sugarbeet seedlings emerged and at a faster rate as the depth of seeding decreased from 4.5 to 1.6 cm. Herbicide injury to sugarbeet seedlings increased as depth of seeding increased from less than to greater than 2.5 cm. Herbicide treatments reduced sugarbeet stand and decreased early season sugarbeet height but had little effect on root yield or sucrose content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallower seeding increased sugarbeet seedling emergence.

Treatment
depth of seeding decreased from 4.5 to 1.6 cme0
Outcome
seedlings emergede0
Direction
Moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More sugarbeet seedlings emerged and at a faster rate as the depth of seeding decreased from 4.5 to 1.6 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallower seeding increased emergence rate.

Treatment
depth of seeding decreased from 4.5 to 1.6 cme0
Outcome
faster ratee0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More sugarbeet seedlings emerged and at a faster rate as the depth of seeding decreased from 4.5 to 1.6 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deeper sowing increased herbicide injury to seedlings.

Treatment
depth of seeding increased from less than to greater than 2.5 cme0
Outcome
Herbicide injurye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide injury to sugarbeet seedlings increased as depth of seeding increased from less than to greater than 2.5 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–381 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatment reduced sugarbeet stand.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
sugarbeet stande0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatments reduced sugarbeet stand and decreased early season sugarbeet height but had little effect on root yield or sucrose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatment decreased early season sugarbeet height.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
early season sugarbeet heighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatments reduced sugarbeet stand and decreased early season sugarbeet height but had little effect on root yield or sucrose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides had little effect on root yield and sucrose content.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
root yield or sucrose contente0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatments reduced sugarbeet stand and decreased early season sugarbeet height but had little effect on root yield or sucrose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–526 · show in text ↑

herbicide · organism · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 8 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 12 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.