Paper · 2001 · Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University)

Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001)

Jim E. Berg; Pat F. Hensleigh; Roger M. Hybner; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This report documents the observations of winter triticale lines to determine if any perform well in Central Montana. Triticale plots were seeded on a west-facing slope to obtain maximum exposure to winter temperatures and wind. Plant densities and percent stand indicate no significant differences among the triticale lines in their ability to survive winter. Triticale lines did not differ significantly from Tiber winter wheat in winter hardiness or in grain yield. Grain yields averaged 2520 lbs/a and test weights were above average at 53.6 lbs/bu. Similar results were obtained in the Statewide Triticale Nursery planted in a more protected area on the research center. Triticale lines tested had a wide range of heading dates and test weight values. Early maturing lines with acceptable test weights and yields comparable to Tiber winter wheat can be selected for and continued in subsequent yield trials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale lines showed no significant differences in ability to survive winter.

Taxon
Winter Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Material
triticale linese1
Outcome
ability to survive wintere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant densities and percent stand indicate no significant differences among the triticale lines in their ability to survive winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–359 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale lines did not differ significantly from Tiber winter wheat in winter hardiness.

Taxon
Winter Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Material
Triticale linese2
Outcome
winter hardinesse2
Direction
did not differe2
Comparator
Tiber winter wheate2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“Triticale lines did not differ significantly from Tiber winter wheat in winter hardiness or in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–467 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale lines did not differ significantly from Tiber winter wheat in grain yield.

Taxon
Winter Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Material
Triticale linese2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
did not differe2
Comparator
Tiber winter wheate2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“Triticale lines did not differ significantly from Tiber winter wheat in winter hardiness or in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–467 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale grain yield averaged 2520 lbs/a.

Taxon
Winter Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
Grain yieldse3
Value
2520 lbs/ae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yields averaged 2520 lbs/a and test weights were above average at 53.6 lbs/bu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale test weight averaged 53.6 lbs/bu, above average.

Taxon
Winter Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
test weightse3
Value
53.6 lbs/bue3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yields averaged 2520 lbs/a and test weights were above average at 53.6 lbs/bu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale lines had a wide range of heading dates and test weight values.

Taxon
Winter Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Material
Triticale linese4
Outcome
heading dates and test weight valuese4
Qualifier
wide rangee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“Triticale lines tested had a wide range of heading dates and test weight values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–755 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Early maturing lines with acceptable test weights and yields comparable to Tiber winter wheat can be selected for continued yield trials.

Taxon
Winter Triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
Early maturing lines with acceptable test weights and yields comparable to Tiber winter wheate5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Experimental Winter Triticale Lines for Adaptation in Montana (2001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“Early maturing lines with acceptable test weights and yields comparable to Tiber winter wheat can be selected for and continued in subsequent yield trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–911 · show in text ↑