Paper · 2002 · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics)

Evaluation of short-duration groundnut genotypes for the arid zone of northwest Rajasthan, India

H S Talwar; M. L. Soni; R. K. Beniwal; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ten genotypes from ICRISAT were sown during 2001 in flat bed (FB), and broad-bed and furrow (BBF) plots. Samples were taken at the onset of intermittent drought (52 days after sowing (DAS)), end of drought (72 DAS) and at final harvest. Total above-ground dry matter, pod mass, crop growth rate and partitioning coefficient were recorded. The results showed that the recovery in growth rates following the release of drought was higher in most of the genotypes when grown on the BBF system as compared to FB system. About half of the genotypes studied maintained higher partitioning when grown on BBF than when grown on FB. The results suggest that the BBF system is promising for short-duration genotypes in northwestern Rajasthan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-rate recovery after drought was higher in most genotypes on BBF than on FB.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
BBF systeme1
Outcome
recovery in growth rates following the release of droughte1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
most of the genotypese1
Comparator
FB systeme1
Setting
arid zone of northwest Rajasthan, Indiat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of short-duration groundnut genotypes for the arid zone of northwest Rajasthan, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“the recovery in growth rates following the release of drought was higher in most of the genotypes when grown on the BBF system as compared to FB system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About half of the genotypes kept higher partitioning on BBF than on FB.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
BBFe2
Outcome
partitioninge2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
About half of the genotypese2
Comparator
FBe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of short-duration groundnut genotypes for the arid zone of northwest Rajasthan, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e2

“About half of the genotypes studied maintained higher partitioning when grown on BBF than when grown on FB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–622 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the BBF system is promising for short-duration genotypes in northwestern Rajasthan.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
BBF system is promisinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of short-duration groundnut genotypes for the arid zone of northwest Rajasthan, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results suggest that the BBF system is promising for short-duration genotypes in northwestern Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–731 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 29 positive, 11 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.