Abstract
Experiments were carried out to study the effect of different water stresses applied at different crop development stages on the yield and yield components of 25 wheat varieties. In a complete randomized block design, replicated 4 times, the 5 water stress treatments i.e. T1 (control), T2 (post flowering drought), T3 (Pre-flowering drought), T4 (Tillering stage drought) and T5 (terminal drought) were applied. Water stress significantly reduced the plant height, spike length, spikelets per spike, grains per spike and 1000grain weight of all 25 wheat varieties. The highest reduction in all parameters was found in T5, while T2 and T3 affected the 1000 grain weight significantly. The varieties Sarsabz and Kiran-95 showed significantly good performance than other wheat varieties in control as well as at terminal drought stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly reduced plant height in all 25 wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- all 25 wheat varietiese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress significantly reduced the plant height, spike length, spikelets per spike, grains per spike and 1000grain weight of all 25 wheat varieties.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly reduced spike length in all 25 wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- spike lengthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- all 25 wheat varietiese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress significantly reduced the plant height, spike length, spikelets per spike, grains per spike and 1000grain weight of all 25 wheat varieties.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly reduced spikelets per spike in all 25 wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- spikelets per spikee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- all 25 wheat varietiese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress significantly reduced the plant height, spike length, spikelets per spike, grains per spike and 1000grain weight of all 25 wheat varieties.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly reduced grains per spike in all 25 wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- grains per spikee0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- all 25 wheat varietiese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress significantly reduced the plant height, spike length, spikelets per spike, grains per spike and 1000grain weight of all 25 wheat varieties.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly reduced 1000grain weight in all 25 wheat varieties.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Water stresse0
- Outcome
- 1000grain weighte0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- all 25 wheat varietiese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Water stress significantly reduced the plant height, spike length, spikelets per spike, grains per spike and 1000grain weight of all 25 wheat varieties.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Terminal drought caused the highest reduction across the measured traits.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- T5e0
- Outcome
- all parameterse0
- Direction
- highest reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest reduction in all parameters was found in T5, while T2 and T3 affected the 1000 grain weight significantly.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Post flowering drought significantly affected thousand grain weight.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- T2e0
- Outcome
- 1000 grain weighte0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest reduction in all parameters was found in T5, while T2 and T3 affected the 1000 grain weight significantly.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre flowering drought significantly affected thousand grain weight.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- T3e0
- Outcome
- 1000 grain weighte0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest reduction in all parameters was found in T5, while T2 and T3 affected the 1000 grain weight significantly.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sarsabz performed significantly better than other varieties under control and terminal drought.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Sarsabze0
- Outcome
- good performancee0
- Direction
- good performancee0
- Qualifier
- control as well as at terminal drought stresse0
- Comparator
- other wheat varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The varieties Sarsabz and Kiran-95 showed significantly good performance than other wheat varieties in control as well as at terminal drought stress.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Kiran-95 performed significantly better than other varieties under control and terminal drought.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Kiran-95e0
- Outcome
- good performancee0
- Direction
- good performancee0
- Qualifier
- control as well as at terminal drought stresse0
- Comparator
- other wheat varietiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The varieties Sarsabz and Kiran-95 showed significantly good performance than other wheat varieties in control as well as at terminal drought stress.”
t0“WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)”
The same questions in other papers
drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
427 papers more in this group
See all 431 papers →drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
628 papers more in this group
See all 632 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.