Paper · 2015 · Journal of Biological Chemistry and Environmental Sciences

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION AND SHADING LEVELS ON CANTALOUPE PRODUCTIVITY IN ARID AREAS (TOSHKA REGION)

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Center, Aswan governorate during two successive late summer seasons of 2009 and 2010. the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of four shading levels (without shading, 40%, 63% and 73%) installed on solid iron framed low tunnels and draped over the bed after 4 weeks from seeds sowing, and four irrigation levels (70%, 85%, 100% and115% of the potential evapotranspiration "ETo") applied by drip irrigation system on growth and productivity of Cantaloupe (Cucmis melon L. var cantaloupenses cv. Royal F1 hybrid). Different measurements have been collected during the experimental time such as: Air temperature (°C), Relative humidity %, Plant height (cm), Leaf area (cm2), Total chlorophyll (SPAD), Number of leaves, Early yield per plant (g/plant), Total yield per plant (kg/plant), Total soluble solids (T.S.S) and Water Use Efficiency (kg/m3). The experiment was arranged in split-plot design with three replicates, the irrigation levels arranged in the main plots where shading levels where arranged in sub main plots. The collected data showed that irrigation level 85% gave the highest yield (4.84 kg/plant), also the shading level 63% obtained the highest yield (5.42 kg/plant), on the other hand, shading level 63% under 85% irrigation level gave the best yield (5.69 kg/plant). Moreover, shading level 63% increased water use efficiency (WUE) under irrigation level 70% of ETo (37.7 kg/m3). It can be concluded that the shading could enhance the water saving and increase the growth and yield by optimizing the climate conditions around the plants under the arid land conditions of Toshka region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 85% irrigation level gave the highest yield, 4.84 kg/plant.

Treatment
irrigation level 85%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.84 kg/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation level 85% gave the highest yield (4.84 kg/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 63% shade level gave the highest yield, 5.42 kg/plant.

Treatment
shading level 63%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.42 kg/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shading level 63% obtained the highest yield (5.42 kg/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 63% shade and 85% irrigation gave the best yield, 5.69 kg/plant.

Treatment
shading level 63% under 85% irrigation levele0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0
Value
5.69 kg/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shading level 63% under 85% irrigation level gave the best yield (5.69 kg/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70% ETo irrigation, 63% shade increased water use efficiency to 37.7 kg/m3.

Treatment
shading level 63%e0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.7 kg/m3e0
Qualifier
irrigation level 70% of EToe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shading level 63% increased water use efficiency (WUE) under irrigation level 70% of ETo (37.7 kg/m3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1408 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude shading could save water and increase growth and yield under Toshka arid conditions.

Outcome
water saving and increase the growth and yielde0
Setting
Toshka regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shading could enhance the water saving and increase the growth and yield by optimizing the climate conditions around the plants under the arid land conditions of Toshka region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–63 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

57 papers: 37 positive, 20 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

shade · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.