Paper · 2026 · Urban Climate

Modelling air pollution removal by urban and peri-urban greenery using integrated high-resolution remote sensing and google street view imagery

Vít Kašpar; Miloš Zapletal; Ondřej Cudlín; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Accurate and scalable estimation of Leaf Area Index (LAI) is essential for understanding vegetation–atmosphere interactions and assessing ecosystem services, such as air pollution removal, across spatial scales, from individual trees to entire urban landscapes. Ground-based methods provide reliable but spatially limited data, while remote sensing (RS) approaches offer broader coverage yet require extensive field validation. Neither alone sufficiently captures the structural complexity of urban vegetation. This study presents a novel framework that integrates high-resolution RS data (airborne laser scanning and multispectral imagery) with hemispherical images derived from Google Street View to estimate spatially continuous LAI and model dry deposition of air pollutants. Applied in Liberec, Czech Republic, during peak vegetation season (June 2019), the framework produced LAI estimates ranging from 0.4 to 5.3 m 2 m −2 (R 2 = 0.85, RMSE = 0.37) at both city-wide and local scales. The approach enabled high-resolution (1-m 2 ) modelling of PM₁₀ and O₃ removal across six sites representing three types of urban greenery. Urban and peri-urban forests exhibited the highest removal rates (PM₁₀: 2.54–2.91 g m −2 ; O₃: 1.85–2.07 g m −2 ), followed by public green spaces (PM₁₀: 1.38–1.49 g m −2 ; O₃: 0.99–1.07 g m −2 ), and street greenery (PM₁₀: 0.82–1.64 g m −2 ; O₃: 0.58–1.15 g m −2 ). By integrating large- and fine-scale vegetation structures, this framework highlights the role of dense, complex greenery in maximizing pollution removal and demonstrates the potential of hybrid methods for precise monitoring of green infrastructure and ecosystem service assessment in urban and peri-urban settings. • Urban greenery LAI varies spatially, affecting pollutant dry deposition efficiency. • Remote sensing and Google Street View enabled mapping city-wide high-resolution LAI. • Captures both macro-scale canopy gradients and fine-scale vegetation variability. • Accurate, low-cost, transferable method for estimating urban pollution removal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The framework estimated urban vegetation LAI from 0.4 to 5.3 m 2 m −2.

Taxon
urban vegetatione1
Outcome
LAI estimatese0
Value
0.4 to 5.3 m 2 m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“the framework produced LAI estimates ranging from 0.4 to 5.3 m 2 m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–928 · show in text ↑
e1

“urban vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–509 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LAI estimation framework achieved R 2 = 0.85.

Taxon
urban vegetatione2
Outcome
LAI estimatese1
Value
R 2 = 0.85e0

Verbatim

e0

“R 2 = 0.85”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“LAI estimates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“urban vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–509 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The LAI estimation framework achieved RMSE = 0.37.

Taxon
urban vegetatione2
Outcome
LAI estimatese1
Value
RMSE = 0.37e0

Verbatim

e0

“RMSE = 0.37”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–953 · show in text ↑
e1

“LAI estimates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–895 · show in text ↑
e2

“urban vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–509 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The approach enabled 1-m 2 modelling of PM₁₀ and O₃ removal.

Taxon
urban greenerye1
Outcome
modelling of PM₁₀ and O₃ removale0
Value
1-m 2e0

Verbatim

e0

“The approach enabled high-resolution (1-m 2 ) modelling of PM₁₀ and O₃ removal across six sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1086 · show in text ↑
e1

“urban greenery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Urban and peri-urban forests had the highest modeled PM₁₀ removal rate, 2.54–2.91 g m −2.

Taxon
Urban and peri-urban forestse0
Outcome
PM₁₀e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.54–2.91 g m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“Urban and peri-urban forests exhibited the highest removal rates (PM₁₀: 2.54–2.91 g m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1219 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Urban and peri-urban forests had the highest modeled O₃ removal rate, 1.85–2.07 g m −2.

Taxon
Urban and peri-urban forestse0
Outcome
O₃e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.85–2.07 g m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“Urban and peri-urban forests exhibited the highest removal rates (PM₁₀: 2.54–2.91 g m −2 ; O₃: 1.85–2.07 g m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1242 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Public green spaces had modeled PM₁₀ removal of 1.38–1.49 g m −2.

Taxon
public green spacese0
Outcome
PM₁₀e0
Value
1.38–1.49 g m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“public green spaces (PM₁₀: 1.38–1.49 g m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1301 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Public green spaces had modeled O₃ removal of 0.99–1.07 g m −2.

Taxon
public green spacese0
Outcome
O₃e0
Value
0.99–1.07 g m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“public green spaces (PM₁₀: 1.38–1.49 g m −2 ; O₃: 0.99–1.07 g m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1324 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Street greenery had modeled PM₁₀ removal of 0.82–1.64 g m −2.

Taxon
street greenerye0
Outcome
PM₁₀e0
Value
0.82–1.64 g m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“street greenery (PM₁₀: 0.82–1.64 g m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1371 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Street greenery had modeled O₃ removal of 0.58–1.15 g m −2.

Taxon
street greenerye0
Outcome
O₃e0
Value
0.58–1.15 g m −2e0

Verbatim

e0

“street greenery (PM₁₀: 0.82–1.64 g m −2 ; O₃: 0.58–1.15 g m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial variation in urban greenery LAI affected pollutant dry deposition efficiency.

Taxon
Urban greenerye0
Organ / stage
LAIe0
Outcome
pollutant dry deposition efficiencye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Urban greenery LAI varies spatially, affecting pollutant dry deposition efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1799 · show in text ↑