Paper · 2026 · Journal of Food Science

Non‐Targeted and Targeted Analyses Using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for Detecting Fungal Spoilage in Red Pepper Powder

Eunji Choi; Hyang Sook Chun; Joong Hyuck Auh; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Red pepper powder (RPP), derived from Capsicum annuum L., is vulnerable to adulteration with fungal-spoiled RPP for profit. This study aimed to detect fungal spoilage in RPP by integrating non-targeted analysis (NTA) and targeted analysis (TA) of non-polar metabolites using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. NTA revealed significant differences in free fatty acid profiles between unspoiled and fungal-spoiled RPP (p < 0.05), specifically due to Alternaria alternata and Colletotrichum acutatum infections. Partial least squares discriminant analysis distinguished the groups and identified palmitic, linoleic, and oleic acids as key markers. TA confirmed significantly elevated levels of these fatty acids in spoiled samples (p < 0.05). A blind test demonstrated spoilage detection at a minimum of 2.5 w/w%, even when mixed with unspoiled samples. These findings establish a reliable approach for identifying fungal spoilage in RPP, offering valuable insights for food safety monitoring and quality control. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This approach offers a reliable tool for food manufacturers, quality control laboratories, and regulatory agencies to verify the authenticity and safety of RPP products. By enabling early and sensitive detection of fungal spoilage, it helps prevent economic fraud and supports consumer health protection. Adoption of this method could strengthen quality assurance protocols and guide regulatory standards in the RPP industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Free fatty acid profiles differed significantly between unspoiled and fungal-spoiled pepper powder.

Taxon
RPPe0
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
free fatty acid profilese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NTA revealed significant differences in free fatty acid profiles between unspoiled and fungal-spoiled RPP (p < 0.05), specifically due to Alternaria alternata and Colletotrichum acutatum infections.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spoiled samples had significantly elevated palmitic, linoleic and oleic acids.

Outcome
palmitic, linoleic, and oleic acidse0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“identified palmitic, linoleic, and oleic acids as key markers. TA confirmed significantly elevated levels of these fatty acids in spoiled samples (p < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–742 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial least squares discriminant analysis distinguished unspoiled and spoiled powder.

Outcome
distinguished the groupse0
Comparator
the groupse0

Verbatim

e0

“Partial least squares discriminant analysis distinguished the groups and identified palmitic, linoleic, and oleic acids as key markers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–647 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A blind test detected fungal spoilage at a minimum of 2.5 w/w%, even mixed with unspoiled powder.

Outcome
spoilage detectione0
Value
2.5 w/w%e0

Verbatim

e0

“A blind test demonstrated spoilage detection at a minimum of 2.5 w/w%, even when mixed with unspoiled samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–853 · show in text ↑