Paper · 2026 · Tropical Journal of Natural Product Research

Traditional Wisdom on Cultivated Edible Plants: Ethnobotany of the Kui Ethnic Group in Sangkha District, Surin Province, Northeastern Thailand

Piyaporn Saensouk; Surapon Saensouk; Phiphat Sonthongphithak; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This study explores the ethnobotanical knowledge of cultivated edible plants among the Kui community in Sangkha District, Surin Province, Northeastern Thailand, emphasising their cultural, nutritional, and medicinal roles. A total of 77 species from 44 families were documented, with Fabaceae and Zingiberaceae being the most represented. Introduced species (62.34%) were more common than native species (37.66%), reflecting historical crop dissemination and cultural adoption, while native species continue to play important roles in cultural identity and ecosystem resilience. Herbs and trees were the predominant growth forms, supporting both immediate and long-term subsistence needs. Analyses of use value (UV), fidelity level (FL), and informant consensus factor (Fic) highlighted key species central to local livelihoods and healthcare, including Citrus hystrix DC., Morinda citrifolia L., Oryza sativa L., and Piper sarmentosum Roxb., demonstrating multifunctionality in both culinary and medicinal contexts. Leaves, rhizomes, and inflorescences were the most commonly used plant parts, suggesting deliberate selection for nutritional and pharmacological benefits. These cultivated edible plants not only sustain traditional food practices but also support livelihoods, income generation, and intergenerational knowledge transfer. The findings provide a basis for future phytochemical, nutritional, socio-cultural, and agroecological studies aimed at enhancing biodiversity conservation, food security, and sustainable use of ethnobotanical resources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

77 species were documented.

Taxon
Cultivated Edible Plantst0
Outcome
speciese0
Value
77 species from 44 familiese0

Verbatim

t0

“Traditional Wisdom on Cultivated Edible Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“A total of 77 species from 44 families were documented, with Fabaceae and Zingiberaceae being the most represented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–337 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fabaceae and Zingiberaceae were the most represented families.

Taxon
Cultivated Edible Plantst0
Material
Fabaceae and Zingiberaceaee0
Outcome
most representede0

Verbatim

t0

“Traditional Wisdom on Cultivated Edible Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“A total of 77 species from 44 families were documented, with Fabaceae and Zingiberaceae being the most represented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–337 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introduced species (62.34%) were more common than native species (37.66%).

Taxon
Cultivated Edible Plantst0
Material
Introduced speciese1
Outcome
more commone1
Value
62.34%e1
Qualifier
native species (37.66%)e1

Verbatim

t0

“Traditional Wisdom on Cultivated Edible Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Introduced species (62.34%) were more common than native species (37.66%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–412 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Citrus hystrix DC. was a key species central to local livelihoods and healthcare.

Taxon
Citrus hystrix DC.Citrus hystrixe3
Outcome
key species central to local livelihoods and healthcaree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus hystrix
Citrus hystrix · TaxonRobyn Jay from Sydney, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“key species central to local livelihoods and healthcare, including Citrus hystrix DC., Morinda citrifolia L., Oryza sativa L., and Piper sarmentosum Roxb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–941 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piper sarmentosum Roxb. was a key species central to local livelihoods and healthcare.

Taxon
Piper sarmentosum Roxb.Piper sarmentosume3
Outcome
key species central to local livelihoods and healthcaree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper sarmentosum
Piper sarmentosum · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“key species central to local livelihoods and healthcare, including Citrus hystrix DC., Morinda citrifolia L., Oryza sativa L., and Piper sarmentosum Roxb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–941 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbs and trees were the predominant growth forms.

Taxon
Cultivated Edible Plantst0
Material
Herbs and treese2
Outcome
predominant growth formse2

Verbatim

t0

“Traditional Wisdom on Cultivated Edible Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e2

“Herbs and trees were the predominant growth forms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–628 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves, rhizomes, and inflorescences were the most commonly used plant parts.

Taxon
Cultivated Edible Plantst0
Organ / stage
Leaves, rhizomes, and inflorescencese4
Outcome
most commonly used plant partse4

Verbatim

t0

“Traditional Wisdom on Cultivated Edible Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“Leaves, rhizomes, and inflorescences were the most commonly used plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1093 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue