Paper · 2026 · Cogent Food & Agriculture

Short-term influence of mixtures of sugarcane filter cake and vermiculite on maize productivity and selected chemical and physical properties in rain-fed sandy soils

Misi Amos Manyanga; Charity Pisa; Pardon Muchaonyerwa

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) face a significant challenge to sustainable crop production. A field trial was conducted during the 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 cropping seasons. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of applying different mixtures of composted sugarcane filter cake (SFC) and vermiculite (V) of different ratios (0, 5, 10, and 20%V) applied at 5 t ha−1 on maize growth and yields and selected soil properties. Positive and negative controls were also evaluated. The 20%V, which was next to the positive control, had higher numbers of leaves and taller plants than the other mixtures at the end of the 2022/2023 season. The total biomass was significantly high for 20%V (13.6 t ha−1) during the 2022/23 season and positive control (7.3 t ha−1) during the 2023/2024 season. During the 2022/23 season, maize yields were higher under 20%V at 7.3 t ha−1, while the positive control (1.33 t ha−1) yielded higher during the 2023/2024 season. The negative control had poorer maize growth and yield than all the other treatments during both seasons. At the end of the 2023/24 season, the 20%V had higher nitrogen, calcium, and magnesium than all other treatments. All the SFC-V mixtures had higher phosphorus content than the controls. Maize responds positively to the application of composted SFC-V mixtures in rain-fed systems, and the 20%V has greater potential for use as a basal fertilizer. This study shows that the use of SFC-V mixtures improves maize growth and yield and soil fertility status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20%V mixture gave higher leaf numbers and taller maize plants than the other mixtures at the end of the 2022/2023 season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
20%Ve1
Outcome
numbers of leaves and taller plantse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
the other mixturese1
Setting
2022/2023 seasone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The 20%V, which was next to the positive control, had higher numbers of leaves and taller plants than the other mixtures at the end of the 2022/2023 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“mixtures of sugarcane filter cake and vermiculite on maize productivity and selected chemical and physical properties in rain-fed sandy soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total maize biomass was significantly higher under 20%V (13.6 t ha−1) in the 2022/23 season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
20%Ve2
Outcome
total biomasse2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
13.6 t ha−1e2
Setting
2022/23 seasone2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The total biomass was significantly high for 20%V (13.6 t ha−1) during the 2022/23 season and positive control (7.3 t ha−1) during the 2023/2024 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total maize biomass was significantly higher under the positive control (7.3 t ha−1) in the 2023/2024 season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
positive controle2
Outcome
total biomasse2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
7.3 t ha−1e2
Setting
2023/2024 seasone2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The total biomass was significantly high for 20%V (13.6 t ha−1) during the 2022/23 season and positive control (7.3 t ha−1) during the 2023/2024 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield was higher under 20%V (7.3 t ha−1) in the 2022/23 season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
20%Ve3
Outcome
maize yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Value
7.3 t ha−1e3
Setting
2022/23 seasone3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“During the 2022/23 season, maize yields were higher under 20%V at 7.3 t ha−1, while the positive control (1.33 t ha−1) yielded higher during the 2023/2024 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive control gave higher maize yield (1.33 t ha−1) in the 2023/2024 season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
positive controle3
Outcome
maize yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Value
1.33 t ha−1e3
Setting
2023/2024 seasone3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“During the 2022/23 season, maize yields were higher under 20%V at 7.3 t ha−1, while the positive control (1.33 t ha−1) yielded higher during the 2023/2024 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative control had poorer maize growth and yield than all other treatments in both seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
negative controle4
Outcome
maize growth and yielde4
Direction
poorere4
Comparator
all the other treatmentse4
Setting
both seasonse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The negative control had poorer maize growth and yield than all the other treatments during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the end of the 2023/24 season, 20%V gave higher nitrogen, calcium and magnesium than all other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
20%Ve5
Outcome
nitrogen, calcium, and magnesiume5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
all other treatmentse5
Setting
2023/24 seasone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“At the end of the 2023/24 season, the 20%V had higher nitrogen, calcium, and magnesium than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All SFC-V mixtures gave higher phosphorus content than the controls.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
SFC-V mixturese6
Outcome
phosphorus contente6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
the controlse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“All the SFC-V mixtures had higher phosphorus content than the controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The 20%V mixture has greater potential than the other mixtures for use as a basal fertilizer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
20%Ve7
Outcome
use as a basal fertilizere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“the 20%V has greater potential for use as a basal fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–95 · show in text ↑