Paper · 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Identification and pathogenicity of fungi causing disease of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruits on farmlands in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria

Liamngee, Kator; Ojo, Fayinminu Akintade; Oyije, Ogezi Endurance

16
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fungi causing disease of cucumber fruits on farmlands in Makurdi was investigated. Diseased cucumber fruits cultivated in farmlands in Makurdi were sampled using the quadrant method. The farmland was divided into four quadrants (A, B, C and D) and the diseased fruits were sampled. They were taken to the Botany Laboratory of the Rev. Fr. Moses Orshio Adasu University for isolation of fungi. Small pieces of decaying cucumber fruits were surfaced sterilized in 5% sodium hypochlorite for 30 seconds to 1 minute and plated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) for fungi isolation. The pathogenicity of the isolated fungi was also carried out on healthy cucumber fruits. Data collected include incidence of fungi, occurrence of specific fungi, mean fungi count and area of rot. Data were analyzed using Chi square (χ2) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Means were separated using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference at 5% level of significance. Two fungi were isolated namely; Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus stolonifer. Results obtained showed that out of 120 cucumber fruits examined in Quadrant A, 15 representing 12.50% were infected, 25 (16.70%) out of the 150 cucumber fruits examined in Quadrant B were infected. Also, 10 (10.50%) out of the 95 cucumber fruits examined at Quadrant C were infected while 30 (18.20%) of the 165 cucumber fruits examined in Quadrant D were infected. Cucumber fruits collected from quadrant D (2.67) had higher fungi count compared to quadrant B (2.00), quadrant A (1.67) and quadrant C (1.33). Eighty 80 (15.10%) out of the 530 cucumber fruits examined in this study were infected with fungi. There was no significant incidence of fungi on infected cucumber fruits across the quadrant (χ2 = 3.69; df = 3; P = 0.29). Cucumber fruits in quadrant D recorded the highest occurrence of fungi 8 (34.80%) followed by quadrant B 6 (26.10%), quadrant A 5 (21.70%) and the least was quadrant C 4 (17.40%) respectively. Aspergillus niger had higher occurrence 12 (52.20%), followed by R. stolonifer 11 (47.80%) respectively. Chi-square analysis showed that there was no statistically significant relationship in the occurrence of specific fungi on cucumber fruits based on location (χ2 = 1.15; df = 3; P = 0.76). The area of rot caused by A. niger (5.33) cm2 and R. stolonifer (4.38) cm2 was significantly higher compared to control (0.00) cm2. The occurrence of these pathogens varied within the farmland. The pathogenicity showed that the fungi were pathogenic on healthy cucumber fruits. Thus, farmers should ensure good agronomic practices on the field such as inspecting the field regularly for any symptoms of decay on the cucumber fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus niger was isolated from diseased cucumber fruits.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
Aspergillus nigerAspergillus nigere0pathogen
Outcome
isolatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two fungi were isolated namely; Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus stolonifer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1012 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizopus stolonifer was isolated from diseased cucumber fruits.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
Rhizopus stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere0pathogen
Outcome
isolatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Two fungi were isolated namely; Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus stolonifer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1012 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quadrant A had 15 infected cucumber fruits, or 12.50%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
were infectede0
Value
12.50%e0
Setting
Quadrant Ae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“out of 120 cucumber fruits examined in Quadrant A, 15 representing 12.50% were infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quadrant B had 25 infected cucumber fruits, or 16.70%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
were infectede0
Value
16.70%e0
Setting
Quadrant Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25 (16.70%) out of the 150 cucumber fruits examined in Quadrant B were infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quadrant C had 10 infected cucumber fruits, or 10.50%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
were infectede0
Value
10.50%e0
Setting
Quadrant Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 (10.50%) out of the 95 cucumber fruits examined at Quadrant C were infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1297 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quadrant D had 30 infected cucumber fruits, or 18.20%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
were infectede0
Value
18.20%e0
Setting
Quadrant De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30 (18.20%) of the 165 cucumber fruits examined in Quadrant D were infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1379 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quadrant D had the highest fungal count at 2.67.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
fungi counte0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.67e0
Setting
quadrant De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber fruits collected from quadrant D (2.67) had higher fungi count compared to quadrant B (2.00), quadrant A (1.67) and quadrant C (1.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1523 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall, 80 of 530 cucumber fruits, or 15.10%, were infected.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
infected with fungie0
Value
15.10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighty 80 (15.10%) out of the 530 cucumber fruits examined in this study were infected with fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1622 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal incidence did not differ significantly across quadrants.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
incidence of fungie0
Setting
quadrante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant incidence of fungi on infected cucumber fruits across the quadrant (χ2 = 3.69; df = 3; P = 0.29)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal occurrence was highest in quadrant D at 34.80%.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
occurrence of fungie0
Direction
higheste0
Value
34.80%e0
Setting
quadrant De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber fruits in quadrant D recorded the highest occurrence of fungi 8 (34.80%) followed by quadrant B 6 (26.10%), quadrant A 5 (21.70%) and the least was quadrant C 4 (17.40%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus niger occurrence was 52.20%, higher than R. stolonifer at 47.80%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
Aspergillus nigerAspergillus nigere0pathogen
Outcome
Aspergillus niger had higher occurrencee0
Direction
highere0
Value
52.20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Aspergillus niger had higher occurrence 12 (52.20%), followed by R. stolonifer 11 (47.80%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2030 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific fungal occurrence was not significantly related to location.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
occurrence of specific fungie0
Setting
locatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no statistically significant relationship in the occurrence of specific fungi on cucumber fruits based on location (χ2 = 1.15; df = 3; P = 0.76)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2231 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A. niger caused 5.33 cm2 of rot, significantly greater than control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
A. nigere0
Interactor
A. nigerAspergillus nigere0pathogen
Outcome
area of rot caused by A. nigere0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.33e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“The area of rot caused by A. niger (5.33) cm2 and R. stolonifer (4.38) cm2 was significantly higher compared to control (0.00) cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2233–2363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R. stolonifer caused 4.38 cm2 of rot, significantly greater than control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
R. stolonifere0
Interactor
R. stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere0pathogen
Outcome
area of rote0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.38e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“The area of rot caused by A. niger (5.33) cm2 and R. stolonifer (4.38) cm2 was significantly higher compared to control (0.00) cm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2233–2363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isolated fungi were pathogenic on healthy cucumber fruits.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
fungi were pathogenic on healthy cucumber fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pathogenicity showed that the fungi were pathogenic on healthy cucumber fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2427–2509 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend regular field inspection for cucumber fruit decay symptoms.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
inspecting the field regularly for any symptoms of decaye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers should ensure good agronomic practices on the field such as inspecting the field regularly for any symptoms of decay on the cucumber fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2517–2664 · show in text ↑