Paper · 2026 · Plants

Impact of Bradyrhizobium elkanii and Azospirillum brasilense Co-Inoculation on Nitrogen Metabolism, Nutrient Uptake, and Soil Fertility Indicators in Phaseolus lunatus Genotypes

Gislayne Kayne Gomes da Cruz; José Aliff da Silva de Souza; José Félix de Brito Neto; et al.

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.), an important legume in semiarid environments, often exhibits low yield, requiring strategies to enhance symbiotic nitrogen fixation and nutrient-use efficiency. This study evaluated the effects of single and combined inoculation with Bradyrhizobium elkanii (strain BR 2003) and Azospirillum brasilense (strain Ab-V5) on nitrogen metabolism, nutrient uptake, plant growth, and residual soil fertility in P. lunatus. Four varieties were subjected to four treatments: control (nitrogen fertilization), single inoculation with B. elkanii or A. brasilense, and co-inoculation. All inoculation strategies significantly increased root nodulation, nitrogen assimilation, and the accumulation of key macronutrients. Root nodulation increased from 1 to 12 nodules per plant in the control treatments to up to 277 nodules per plant under inoculation, while shoot nitrogen content increased by up to 91% in ‘Raio de Sol’ and 87% in ‘Cearense’. Increases in P and K were also observed, including a 48% increase in shoot P in ‘Manteiga’ and up to a 100% increase in shoot K in ‘Raio de Sol’, whereas root K increased by up to 90% under co-inoculation. The ‘Raio de Sol’ and ‘Manteiga’ varieties exhibited the most pronounced increases in growth and biomass. Additionally, inoculation improved post-cultivation soil indicators, including pH and available P and K in specific genotype-microbe combinations, and reduced electrical conductivity. These results demonstrate the strong contribution of microbial inoculation to nitrogen assimilation and nutrient acquisition, supporting its use as a promising alternative to conventional nitrogen fertilization in lima bean cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased root nodulation from 1–12 to as many as 277 nodules per plant.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Root nodulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 277 nodules per plante0
Qualifier
1 to 12 nodules per plante0
Comparator
control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All inoculation strategies significantly increased root nodulation, nitrogen assimilation, and the accumulation of key macronutrients. Root nodulation increased from 1 to 12 nodules per plant in the control treatments to up to 277 nodules per plant under inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–872 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased nitrogen assimilation.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Treatment
inoculation strategiese0
Outcome
nitrogen assimilatione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (nitrogen fertilization)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All inoculation strategies significantly increased root nodulation, nitrogen assimilation, and the accumulation of key macronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
e2

“control (nitrogen fertilization), single inoculation with B. elkanii or A. brasilense, and co-inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased macronutrient accumulation.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Treatment
inoculation strategiese0
Outcome
accumulation of key macronutrientse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (nitrogen fertilization)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All inoculation strategies significantly increased root nodulation, nitrogen assimilation, and the accumulation of key macronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
e2

“control (nitrogen fertilization), single inoculation with B. elkanii or A. brasilense, and co-inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–604 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot nitrogen rose by up to 91% in Raio de Sol.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Material
Raio de Sole0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
shoot nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot nitrogen content increased by up to 91% in ‘Raio de Sol’ and 87% in ‘Cearense’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus lunatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“under inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot nitrogen rose by 87% in Cearense.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Material
Cearensee0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
shoot nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot nitrogen content increased by up to 91% in ‘Raio de Sol’ and 87% in ‘Cearense’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus lunatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“under inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot phosphorus rose 48% in Manteiga.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Material
Manteigae0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
shoot Pe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 48% increase in shoot P in ‘Manteiga’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1056 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus lunatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“under inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot potassium rose by up to 100% in Raio de Sol.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Material
Raio de Sole0
Treatment
inoculatione2
Outcome
shoot Ke0
Direction
increasee0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“up to a 100% increase in shoot K in ‘Raio de Sol’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1110 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus lunatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“under inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root potassium rose by up to 90% under co-inoculation.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Treatment
co-inoculatione0
Outcome
root Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root K increased by up to 90% under co-inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1170 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus lunatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raio de Sol and Manteiga had the largest growth and biomass increases.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Material
Raio de Sol’ and ‘Manteigae0
Outcome
growth and biomasse0
Direction
most pronounced increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ‘Raio de Sol’ and ‘Manteiga’ varieties exhibited the most pronounced increases in growth and biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1277 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus lunatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation improved post cultivation soil pH and available phosphorus and potassium in particular genotype microbe combinations.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
pH and available P and Ke0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
specific genotype-microbe combinationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation improved post-cultivation soil indicators, including pH and available P and K in specific genotype-microbe combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1423 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus lunatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced soil electrical conductivity.

Taxon
Phaseolus lunatus L.Phaseolus lunatuse1
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
electrical conductivitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation improved post-cultivation soil indicators, including pH and available P and K in specific genotype-microbe combinations, and reduced electrical conductivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1460 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phaseolus lunatus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose microbial inoculation as an alternative to nitrogen fertilization in lima bean.

Taxon
lima beanPhaseolus lunatuse0
Outcome
promising alternative to conventional nitrogen fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus lunatus
Phaseolus lunatus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supporting its use as a promising alternative to conventional nitrogen fertilization in lima bean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1697 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus lunatus (lima bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus lunatus (lima bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.