Paper · 2026 · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

Indigenous knowledge on the uses and conservation of medicinal plants in Namutumba District, Eastern Uganda

Patience Tugume; Jamilu E. Ssenku; Savina Asiimwe; et al.

18
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The decline of medicinal plants poses a significant threat to traditional healthcare systems in Uganda. This decline is driven by excessive global consumption estimated at 85%, and upsurge of herbal medicine trade amidst conservation challenges. This study documented indigenous knowledge on the commonly used medicinal plants in Namutumba district, Eastern Uganda. The study also documented demographic characteristics of informants, and assessed local conservation practices in order to inform more effective conservation strategies. METHODS: An ethnobotanical survey involving 300 respondents was conducted using pre-tested, semi-structured questionnaires in 17 sub-counties of Namutumba District. Data were analysed with descriptive and inferential statistics using STATA version-15.0, and Graphs plotted using GraphPad Prism® version 9.0.0. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-four medicinal plant species belonging to 63 families and 160 genera were documented. Plants were mostly obtained from bushlands (Frequency of citation = 276, 92.0%), markets (247, 82.3%), and wetlands (224, 74.7%). Plants belonged mainly to families Fabaceae (24, 13.7%), Asteraceae (15, 8.6%), and Euphorbiaceae (10, 5.7%). Leaves were the commonly used plant parts (532, 45.7%). The plants were cited for treating infectious diseases like malaria, and non-infectious chronic ailments such as diabetes (42, 24.0%) and cancer (17, 9.7%). Kigelia africana was the most cited species with Relative Frequency of Citation of 0.22. Almost all respondents (289, 96.3%) acknowledged a considerable decline in the availability of 13 medicinal plants including Aloe wollastoni and Commiphora Africana, significantly attributed more to climate change (296, 95.5%), than other factors like overharvesting, agriculture, and habitat destruction (χ2, p < 0.05). Conservation strategies were scarce. Four of the medicinal plants documented in this survey were found to be Red listed among the plants whose population has greatly declined and is vulnerable to extinction in Uganda and globally. CONCLUSION: Despite the rich diversity of medicinal plants in Namutumba, conservation strategies are scarce, and some plants are globally red listed among the species whose population has greatly declined and are vulnerable to extinction. Therefore, in Uganda, conservation strategies that are tailored to vulnerable, rural areas such as Namutumba district, are warranted to improve intervention outcomes in such settings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One hundred and seventy-four medicinal plant species were documented.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
medicinal plant speciese1
Value
One hundred and seventy-foure1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“One hundred and seventy-four medicinal plant species belonging to 63 families and 160 genera were documented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–975 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medicinal plants belong to 63 families.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
familiese1
Value
63e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“One hundred and seventy-four medicinal plant species belonging to 63 families and 160 genera were documented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–975 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The medicinal plants belong to 160 genera.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
generae1
Value
160e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“One hundred and seventy-four medicinal plant species belonging to 63 families and 160 genera were documented”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–975 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medicinal plants were mostly obtained from bushlands (92.0%).

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
obtained from bushlandse1
Value
92.0%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants were mostly obtained from bushlands (Frequency of citation = 276, 92.0%), markets (247, 82.3%), and wetlands (224, 74.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medicinal plants were obtained from markets (82.3%).

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
marketse1
Value
82.3%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants were mostly obtained from bushlands (Frequency of citation = 276, 92.0%), markets (247, 82.3%), and wetlands (224, 74.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medicinal plants were obtained from wetlands (74.7%).

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
wetlandse1
Value
74.7%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants were mostly obtained from bushlands (Frequency of citation = 276, 92.0%), markets (247, 82.3%), and wetlands (224, 74.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fabaceae was the most represented family among the medicinal plants (13.7%).

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
Fabaceaee1
Value
13.7%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants belonged mainly to families Fabaceae (24, 13.7%), Asteraceae (15, 8.6%), and Euphorbiaceae (10, 5.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1215 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Asteraceae represented 8.6% of the medicinal plants.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
Asteraceaee1
Value
8.6%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants belonged mainly to families Fabaceae (24, 13.7%), Asteraceae (15, 8.6%), and Euphorbiaceae (10, 5.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1215 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Euphorbiaceae represented 5.7% of the medicinal plants.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
Euphorbiaceaee1
Value
5.7%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants belonged mainly to families Fabaceae (24, 13.7%), Asteraceae (15, 8.6%), and Euphorbiaceae (10, 5.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1215 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves were the most commonly used plant part (45.7%).

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Organ / stage
Leavese1
Outcome
Leavese1
Value
45.7%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaves were the commonly used plant parts (532, 45.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1271 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plants were cited for treating infectious diseases such as malaria.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
treating infectious diseasese1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plants were cited for treating infectious diseases like malaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diabetes was cited as a non-infectious chronic ailment treated with the plants (24.0%).

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
diabetese1
Value
24.0%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“non-infectious chronic ailments such as diabetes (42, 24.0%) and cancer (17, 9.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cancer was cited as a non-infectious chronic ailment treated with the plants (9.7%).

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
cancere1
Value
9.7%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“non-infectious chronic ailments such as diabetes (42, 24.0%) and cancer (17, 9.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kigelia africana was the most cited species, with a Relative Frequency of Citation of 0.22.

Taxon
Kigelia africanaKigelia africanae1
Outcome
Relative Frequency of Citatione1
Value
0.22e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Kigelia africana
Kigelia africana · TaxonBjørn Christian Tørrissen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Kigelia africana was the most cited species with Relative Frequency of Citation of 0.22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1517 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Almost all respondents (96.3%) acknowledged a considerable decline in the availability of medicinal plants.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
considerable decline in the availabilitye1
Value
96.3%e1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Almost all respondents (289, 96.3%) acknowledged a considerable decline in the availability of 13 medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1633 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The decline in availability was attributed more to climate change (95.5%) than to other factors.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
attributed more to climate changee1
Value
95.5%e1
Comparator
other factors like overharvesting, agriculture, and habitat destructione1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly attributed more to climate change (296, 95.5%), than other factors like overharvesting, agriculture, and habitat destruction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1823 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four of the documented medicinal plants were found to be Red listed.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
Red listede1
Value
Foure1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four of the medicinal plants documented in this survey were found to be Red listed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1877–1959 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation strategies for the medicinal plants were scarce.

Taxon
medicinal plantst0
Outcome
Conservation strategiese1
Qualifier
scarcee1

Verbatim

t0

“medicinal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Conservation strategies were scarce.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1876 · show in text ↑