Claim · model-written summary
Euphorbiaceae represented 5.7% of the medicinal plants.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Verbatim
t0“medicinal plants”
e1“Plants belonged mainly to families Fabaceae (24, 13.7%), Asteraceae (15, 8.6%), and Euphorbiaceae (10, 5.7%)”
Title
Patience Tugume; Jamilu E. Ssenku; Savina Asiimwe; et al. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 2026. doi:10.1186/s12906-025-05235-9
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Observation One hundred and seventy-four medicinal plant species were documented.
- Observation The medicinal plants belong to 63 families.
- Observation The medicinal plants belong to 160 genera.
- Observation Medicinal plants were mostly obtained from bushlands (92.0%).
- Observation Medicinal plants were obtained from markets (82.3%).
- Observation Medicinal plants were obtained from wetlands (74.7%).
- Observation Fabaceae was the most represented family among the medicinal plants (13.7%).
- Observation Asteraceae represented 8.6% of the medicinal plants.
- Observation Leaves were the most commonly used plant part (45.7%).
- Observation The plants were cited for treating infectious diseases such as malaria.
- Observation Diabetes was cited as a non-infectious chronic ailment treated with the plants (24.0%).
- Observation Cancer was cited as a non-infectious chronic ailment treated with the plants (9.7%).
- Observation Kigelia africana was the most cited species, with a Relative Frequency of Citation of 0.22.
- Observation Almost all respondents (96.3%) acknowledged a considerable decline in the availability of medicinal plants.
- Observation The decline in availability was attributed more to climate change (95.5%) than to other factors.
- Observation Four of the documented medicinal plants were found to be Red listed.
- Observation Conservation strategies for the medicinal plants were scarce.