Paper · 2026 · Functional Ecology

Fungi rather than bacteria explain home‐field advantage for decomposition of litter carbon fractions

Cheng‐Kang Xia; Yong Lin; Xuan Wu; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The home‐field advantage (HFA) hypothesis proposes that specific interactions between litter and microbial communities can accelerate litter mass loss in home habitats relative to away habitats. However, the role of HFA in regulating the decomposition of individual carbon (C) fractions with distinct chemical structures remain largely unexplored. In particular, it is unclear to what extent litter‐layer microbial communities—shaped by interactions between litter and soil microbial communities—drive the fraction‐specific manifestation of HFA during litter C decomposition. A 480‐day reciprocal litter transplant experiment was conducted across forest and cropland ecosystems. The effect of HFA on the loss of four C fractions (dissolved organic carbon, cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin) with varying chemical qualities, as well as the role of litter‐layer microbial communities in this process, were assessed using four litter types: two forest litters ( Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesii ) and two cropland litters ( Zea mays and Eleusine indica ). HFA significantly accelerated the loss of both total litter mass and individual C fractions, with particularly strong effects on the recalcitrant lignin fraction. Litter‐layer microbial communities were the key drivers of HFA, as microbial community dissimilarity between home and away sites showed a significant negative correlation with HFA for lignin loss. Moreover, a higher abundance of specific fungal taxa at home sites accelerated C fraction decomposition, whereas specific bacterial taxa suppressed decomposition. These findings suggest that HFA differentially affects the decomposition of individual C fractions, likely mediated by specific litter‐layer microbial communities at home sites. Overall, this study underscore the critical role of recalcitrant C substrates and litter‐layer fungal taxa in shaping HFA and advance understanding of the microbial processes underlying litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HFA significantly accelerated loss of total litter mass and individual C fractions relative to away sites.

Taxon
Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesiiSchima superbaCastanopsis fargesiie2
Treatment
reciprocal litter transplant experimente3
Outcome
total litter mass and individual C fractionse1
Direction
acceleratede1
Comparator
away sitese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima superba
Schima superba · TaxonKeisotyo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“two forest litters ( Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesii ) and two cropland litters ( Zea mays and Eleusine indica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1069 · show in text ↑
e3

“reciprocal litter transplant experiment was conducted across forest and cropland ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–686 · show in text ↑
e4

“microbial community dissimilarity between home and away sites showed a significant negative correlation with HFA for lignin loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1429 · show in text ↑
e1

“HFA significantly accelerated the loss of both total litter mass and individual C fractions, with particularly strong effects on the recalcitrant lignin fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HFA had particularly strong effects on loss of the recalcitrant lignin fraction.

Taxon
Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesiiSchima superbaCastanopsis fargesiie2
Treatment
HFAe1
Outcome
recalcitrant lignin fractione1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
away sitese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima superba
Schima superba · TaxonKeisotyo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“two forest litters ( Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesii ) and two cropland litters ( Zea mays and Eleusine indica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1069 · show in text ↑
e4

“microbial community dissimilarity between home and away sites showed a significant negative correlation with HFA for lignin loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1429 · show in text ↑
e1

“HFA significantly accelerated the loss of both total litter mass and individual C fractions, with particularly strong effects on the recalcitrant lignin fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1232 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial community dissimilarity between home and away sites was negatively correlated with lignin loss.

Taxon
Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesiiSchima superbaCastanopsis fargesiie2
Treatment
microbial community dissimilarity between home and away sitese4
Outcome
lignin losse4
Direction
negativee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima superba
Schima superba · TaxonKeisotyo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“two forest litters ( Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesii ) and two cropland litters ( Zea mays and Eleusine indica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1069 · show in text ↑
e4

“microbial community dissimilarity between home and away sites showed a significant negative correlation with HFA for lignin loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1429 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher abundance of specific fungal taxa at home sites accelerated C fraction decomposition.

Taxon
Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesiiSchima superbaCastanopsis fargesiie2
Treatment
higher abundance of specific fungal taxa at home sitese5
Outcome
C fraction decompositione5
Direction
acceleratede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima superba
Schima superba · TaxonKeisotyo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“two forest litters ( Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesii ) and two cropland litters ( Zea mays and Eleusine indica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1069 · show in text ↑
e5

“a higher abundance of specific fungal taxa at home sites accelerated C fraction decomposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1534 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific bacterial taxa suppressed litter decomposition.

Taxon
Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesiiSchima superbaCastanopsis fargesiie2
Treatment
specific bacterial taxae6
Outcome
decompositione6
Direction
suppressede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Schima superba
Schima superba · TaxonKeisotyo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“two forest litters ( Schima superba and Castanopsis fargesii ) and two cropland litters ( Zea mays and Eleusine indica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1069 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas specific bacterial taxa suppressed decomposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1592 · show in text ↑