Paper · 2025 · JuSER Publikationsportal

No short-term benefits of inoculation with ericoid mycorrhizal fungi for highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum: Ericaceae) cultivated under controlled conditions in rhizotrons

Kiladze, E.; Wojciechowski, T.; Bryla, D. R.; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (ErMF) enhance nutrient uptake in highbush blueberry (Vaccinium sp.); however, it is unclear whether inoculating plants with ErMF is actually beneficial. A 40-day rhizotron trial evaluated the effects of two ErMF isolates (Hyaloscypha hepaticicola and Oidiodendron maius), individually and combined, on growth and root develop­ment of the ‘Duke’ and ‘Legacy’ varieties of highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum s. l. Fungal inoculation increased leaf nitrogen concentration in the ‘Duke’ cultivar plants; a decrease in root biomass was also recorded for the ‘Legacy’ cultivar plants compared to the uninoculated plants. The total root length in the ‘Duke’ cultivar was lower with O. maius or combined inoculum, and leaf potassium concentration in the ‘Legacy’ cultivar decreased with H. hepaticicola or combined inoculum. These findings suggest no short-term benefits of ErMF inoculation for highbush blueberry under the tested conditions. Further research is needed to evaluate potential long-term effects and optimize inoculation strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal inoculation increased leaf nitrogen concentration in the ‘Duke’ cultivar of highbush blueberry compared with uninoculated plants.

Taxon
highbush blueberryVaccinium corymbosume0
Material
Dukee1
Treatment
Fungal inoculatione1
Interactor
ErMFe3symbiont
Outcome
leaf nitrogen concentratione1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
uninoculated plantse2
Setting
rhizotrone4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (ErMF) enhance nutrient uptake in highbush blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fungal inoculation increased leaf nitrogen concentration in the ‘Duke’ cultivar plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–531 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared to the uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–646 · show in text ↑
e3

“evaluated the effects of two ErMF isolates (Hyaloscypha hepaticicola and Oidiodendron maius)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–297 · show in text ↑
e4

“A 40-day rhizotron trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal inoculation decreased root biomass of the ‘Legacy’ cultivar of highbush blueberry compared with uninoculated plants.

Taxon
highbush blueberryVaccinium corymbosume0
Material
Legacye2
Treatment
two ErMF isolatese1
Interactor
ErMFe1symbiont
Outcome
root biomasse2
Direction
decreasee2
Comparator
uninoculated plantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (ErMF) enhance nutrient uptake in highbush blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“evaluated the effects of two ErMF isolates (Hyaloscypha hepaticicola and Oidiodendron maius)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–297 · show in text ↑
e2

“a decrease in root biomass was also recorded for the ‘Legacy’ cultivar plants compared to the uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total root length of the ‘Duke’ cultivar was lower with Oidiodendron maius or combined inoculum.

Taxon
highbush blueberryVaccinium corymbosume0
Material
Dukee1
Treatment
O. maius or combined inoculume1
Interactor
O. maiusOidiodendron maiuse1symbiont
Outcome
total root lengthe1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (ErMF) enhance nutrient uptake in highbush blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total root length in the ‘Duke’ cultivar was lower with O. maius or combined inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf potassium concentration of the ‘Legacy’ cultivar decreased with Hyaloscypha hepaticicola or combined inoculum.

Taxon
highbush blueberryVaccinium corymbosume0
Material
Legacye1
Treatment
H. hepaticicola or combined inoculume1
Interactor
H. hepaticicolaHyaloscypha hepaticicolae1symbiont
Outcome
leaf potassium concentratione1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hyaloscypha hepaticicola
Hyaloscypha hepaticicola · InteractorNina Filippova (The Fungarium of Yugra State University) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (ErMF) enhance nutrient uptake in highbush blueberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf potassium concentration in the ‘Legacy’ cultivar decreased with H. hepaticicola or combined inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–848 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

ErMF inoculation showed no short-term benefit for highbush blueberry under the tested conditions.

Taxon
highbush blueberryVaccinium corymbosume1
Outcome
short-term benefits of ErMF inoculatione1
Qualifier
under the tested conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vaccinium corymbosum
Vaccinium corymbosum · TaxonThe original Uploader was Oven Fresh at English Wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“no short-term benefits of ErMF inoculation for highbush blueberry under the tested conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–966 · show in text ↑

Oidiodendron maius · growth · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Hyaloscypha hepaticicola · nutrient: content · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vaccinium corymbosum (highbush blueberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.