Paper · 2026 · Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control

Biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus in stored wheat using Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1 with antagonistic capacity through volatile compounds production

Hussien M. AboDalam; Mona Mahmoud Maher Ragab; Marwa Abd-Elateef Zayton; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Contamination of stored wheat grains by Aspergillus flavus poses serious food safety risks due to aflatoxin production. This study aimed to identify and evaluate wheat-associated bacterial isolates for their potential to biologically control A. flavus . Two promising strains, Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1, were selected based on a strong antifungal activity against A. flavus , on dual culture assays. Results Dual-culture and co-cultivation assays confirmed that both strains significantly inhibited A. flavus mycelial growth and sporulation. Additionally, both strains exhibited facultative mycophagy, utilizing fungal biomass under nutrient-limited conditions. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by these bacteria suppressed fungal growth in vitro and on wheat grains without direct contact. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) profiling revealed that Bacillus sp. B3 primarily emitted nitrogenous and oxime-related compounds, while Bacillus sp. Mn1 produced diverse volatiles including fatty acids, hydrazine derivatives, and trigonelline. Both strains significantly reduced fungal colonization on treated grains. The strains were characterized through 16 S rRNA gene sequencing, alongside biochemical and enzymatic profiling, to aid taxonomic placement and provide insight into their functional potential. Conclusion Bacillus sp. B3 and Mn1 demonstrated robust antifungal potential through multiple antagonistic mechanisms including diffusible metabolites, mycophagy, and VOC-mediated inhibition. These findings support their use as sustainable, residue-free biocontrol agents to mitigate A. flavus contamination and enhance the safety of stored wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Bacillus strains significantly inhibited A. flavus mycelial growth and sporulation in dual culture and co-cultivation.

Treatment
Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1e2
Interactor
A. flavusAspergillus flavuse1pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1Bacillus sp. B3Bacillus sp. MN1e2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
A. flavus mycelial growth and sporulatione1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus in stored wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dual-culture and co-cultivation assays confirmed that both strains significantly inhibited A. flavus mycelial growth and sporulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–571 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two promising strains, Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strains significantly reduced fungal colonization on treated wheat grains.

Treatment
Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1e2
Interactor
Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1Bacillus sp. B3Bacillus sp. MN1e2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fungal colonizatione6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus in stored wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Contamination of stored wheat grains by Aspergillus flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two promising strains, Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–333 · show in text ↑
e6

“Both strains significantly reduced fungal colonization on treated grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VOCs produced by the two Bacillus strains suppressed fungal growth in vitro and on wheat grains without direct contact.

Treatment
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)e3
Interactor
Aspergillus flavusAspergillus flavuse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1Bacillus sp. B3Bacillus sp. MN1e2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fungal growthe3
Direction
suppressede3
Setting
in vitro and on wheat grainse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus flavus
Aspergillus flavus · InteractorUS gov · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus in stored wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Contamination of stored wheat grains by Aspergillus flavus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“Two promising strains, Bacillus sp. B3 and Bacillus sp. Mn1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by these bacteria suppressed fungal growth in vitro and on wheat grains without direct contact”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–830 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus sp. B3 primarily emitted nitrogenous and oxime-related compounds.

Material
Bacillus sp. B3e4
Outcome
emitted nitrogenous and oxime-related compoundse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus in stored wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e4

“Bacillus sp. B3 primarily emitted nitrogenous and oxime-related compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–974 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus sp. Mn1 produced diverse volatiles including fatty acids, hydrazine derivatives and trigonelline.

Material
Bacillus sp. Mn1e5
Outcome
diverse volatilese5
Qualifier
fatty acids, hydrazine derivatives, and trigonellinee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus in stored wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e5

“Bacillus sp. Mn1 produced diverse volatiles including fatty acids, hydrazine derivatives, and trigonelline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both strains exhibited facultative mycophagy, using fungal biomass under nutrient-limited conditions.

Outcome
facultative mycophagye7
Qualifier
utilizing fungal biomass under nutrient-limited conditionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus in stored wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e7

“Both strains exhibited facultative mycophagy, utilizing fungal biomass under nutrient-limited conditions”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 587–691 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The two Bacillus strains show robust antifungal potential explained by multiple antagonistic mechanisms.

Outcome
antifungal potentiale1
Qualifier
diffusible metabolites, mycophagy, and VOC-mediated inhibitione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Biocontrol of Aspergillus flavus in stored wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus sp. B3 and Mn1 demonstrated robust antifungal potential through multiple antagonistic mechanisms including diffusible metabolites, mycophagy, and VOC-mediated inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1546 · show in text ↑