Paper · 2025 · BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences

Effect of Manures and Fertilizers on Seedling Growth of Vigna radiata L.

D. Dhanashree Jadhav; D. Yuvraj Kengar

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Present work was carried out to study the effect of some organic fertilizers such as cow dung, cow urine and their mixture and inorganic fertilizers like DAP (Di-ammonium phosphate), urea and their mixture on seedling growth of Vigna radiata L. Different concentrations viz. 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2% of these organic and inorganic fertilizers were used. Vigna radiata seeds were treated with these fertilizers. Maximum seedling growth was observed due to the treatment with organic fertilizers. Higher growth rate of the seedling was recorded due to the treatment with 2 % organic fertilizers. Further analysis showed that enhancement in root and shoots length was observed with increase in the concentration of fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum seedling growth was observed with organic fertilizer treatment.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
organic fertilizerse1
Outcome
seedling growthe1
Direction
Maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum seedling growth was observed due to the treatment with organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–487 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seedling growth rate was recorded with 2% organic fertilizers.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
2 % organic fertilizerse1
Outcome
growth rate of the seedlinge1
Direction
Highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher growth rate of the seedling was recorded due to the treatment with 2 % organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–586 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot length were enhanced with increasing fertilizer concentration.

Taxon
Vigna radiataVigna radiatat0
Treatment
concentration of fertilizerse1
Outcome
root and shoots lengthe1
Direction
enhancemente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vigna radiata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhancement in root and shoots length was observed with increase in the concentration of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–717 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.