Paper · 2026 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Methodologies for Scoring Pseudomonas syringae pv. Actinidiae Floral Bud Rot and the Impact on Yield Potential in Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa

Elizabeth Popowski; Poppy Miller; Marcus Davy; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Flower production is a key determinant of yield in many fruit crops, including kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa ). Floral development is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, with biotic stressors such as pathogens also playing a role in reproductive success. In kiwifruit, the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) has been linked to floral bud rot (FBR), a phenomenon that may affect flower opening and overall yield. However, the effects of Psa on flower development and fruit set have not yet been thoroughly investigated. We examined the development of Psa‐induced FBR on yield potential within an A. chinensis var. deliciosa seedling population. Two novel methods were employed to determine the severity of FBR symptoms in a kiwifruit seedling population. The first method involved detailed daily measurements of FBR on individual flower buds, recorded over a flowering season. The final fate of each flower bud (successful or unsuccessful fruit set) and the shape of the resulting fruit (normal or deformed) were recorded. The second, more efficient method used less detailed scoring of the FBR symptoms. Results showed that the development of FBR symptoms was not correlated with the severity of the final FBR expression, with an average of 11 days from the symptom onset to the final FBR expression. Flower buds with over 50% of the sepals affected by FBR have a lower chance of successful pollination and, if pollination does occur, there is a higher chance that a deformed fruit will form. Both detailed and simplified methodologies effectively scored FBR symptoms within an A. chinensis var . deliciosa seedling population, with the simplified four‐category scoring system being the more efficient.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FBR symptom development was not correlated with final FBR severity.

Taxon
Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosaActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
FBR symptomse0
Outcome
severity of the final FBR expressione0
Direction
not correlatede0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development of FBR symptoms was not correlated with the severity of the final FBR expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average interval from FBR symptom onset to final expression was 11 days.

Taxon
Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosaActinidia deliciosat0
Outcome
final FBR expressione0
Value
11 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with an average of 11 days from the symptom onset to the final FBR expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower buds with over 50% of sepals affected by FBR had a lower chance of successful pollination.

Taxon
Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosaActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
Flower budse0
Outcome
successful pollinatione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
over 50% of the sepals affected by FBRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower buds with over 50% of the sepals affected by FBR have a lower chance of successful pollination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–148 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

If pollination occurred, buds with over 50% of sepals affected by FBR had a higher chance of deformed fruit.

Taxon
Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosaActinidia deliciosat0
Organ / stage
Flower budse0
Outcome
deformed fruite0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
if pollination does occure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower buds with over 50% of the sepals affected by FBR have a lower chance of successful pollination and, if pollination does occur, there is a higher chance that a deformed fruit will form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–148 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both detailed and simplified methods effectively scored FBR symptoms.

Taxon
A. chinensis var . deliciosaActinidia chinensise0
Outcome
scored FBR symptomse0
Direction
effectivelye0
Comparator
detailed and simplified methodologiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia chinensis
Actinidia chinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryw:User:Achiwiki356 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both detailed and simplified methodologies effectively scored FBR symptoms within an A. chinensis var . deliciosa seedling population, with the simplified four‐category scoring system being the more efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1762 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The simplified four category scoring system was more efficient than detailed scoring.

Taxon
A. chinensis var . deliciosaActinidia chinensise0
Outcome
efficiente0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
detailede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia chinensis
Actinidia chinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryw:User:Achiwiki356 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both detailed and simplified methodologies effectively scored FBR symptoms within an A. chinensis var . deliciosa seedling population, with the simplified four‐category scoring system being the more efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1762 · show in text ↑