Method / resourcemodel-written summary

The simplified four category scoring system was more efficient than detailed scoring.

A claim from Methodologies for Scoring Pseudomonas syringae pv. Actinidiae Floral Bud Rot and the Impact on Yield Potential in Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa · 2026

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The simplified four category scoring system was more efficient than detailed scoring.

Taxon
A. chinensis var . deliciosaActinidia chinensise0
Outcome
efficiente0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
detailede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia chinensis
Actinidia chinensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryw:User:Achiwiki356 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both detailed and simplified methodologies effectively scored FBR symptoms within an A. chinensis var . deliciosa seedling population, with the simplified four‐category scoring system being the more efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1762

Title

Methodologies for Scoring Pseudomonas syringae pv. Actinidiae Floral Bud Rot and the Impact on Yield Potential in Actinidia chinensis var. deliciosa

Elizabeth Popowski; Poppy Miller; Marcus Davy; et al. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2026. doi:10.1002/nzc2.70051

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-96b0fdfeb4ab4e704cb252d6ec4254836d3bcb8111c4afd5e056fb2633a40825 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer