Paper · 2026 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Feremycorrhizal Fungus Austroboletus occidentalis Improves Growth and Nutrition of Diverse Crop and Pasture Species

Yasodhini Malika Liyanage; Khalil Kariman; Saleh Rahimlou; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Feremycorrhiza (FM) is a beneficial symbiosis between the Australian native fungus Austroboletus occidentalis and diverse plant species, including eucalypts, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) crops, and non-AM crops such as canola. This study aimed to investigate the generalist nature of the FM fungus across multiple host plants, and its effects on plant-available soil phosphorus (P) and plant P uptake efficiency (PUpE). The effects of A. occidentalis on plant growth, shoot nutrient uptake, soil P availability, and PUpE in 14 crop and pasture species including cereals, forage grasses, legumes, and oilseeds were investigated under P-deficient conditions, using low-P soils (Colwell P = 4–5 mg kg − 1 ) supplemented with a minimal P dose (2 mg kg − 1 ). Plants were harvested after 6 weeks of growth. Inoculated plants of all species had significantly increased shoot and root biomass, compared with the non-inoculated controls. Most inoculated crop and pasture species also exhibited increased shoot contents of nutrients, including P, nitrogen, potassium, and several micronutrients. Plant-available P in soil was significantly higher ( p < 0.05) in the inoculated treatments compared with the non-inoculated controls across all plant species. PUpE was also enhanced in most inoculated species, with the highest gains in wheat (by 122%) and maize (by 65%) relative to the control. Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures, highlighting its role as a generalist symbiont. By enhancing soil-available P, plant nutrient uptake and growth, the FM symbiosis presents a novel approach for sustainable P management in cropping and pasture systems. Graphical Abstract

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated crop and pasture plants had significantly increased shoot and root biomass compared with non-inoculated controls.

Taxon
crops and pasturese5
Treatment
Inoculatede1
Interactor
Austroboletus occidentalisAustroboletus occidentalise5symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root biomasse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
non-inoculated controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Austroboletus occidentalis
Austroboletus occidentalis · InteractorGerhard Koller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1485 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculated plants of all species had significantly increased shoot and root biomass, compared with the non-inoculated controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most inoculated crop and pasture species had increased shoot contents of nutrients.

Taxon
crops and pasturese5
Treatment
inoculatede2
Interactor
Austroboletus occidentalisAustroboletus occidentalise5symbiont
Outcome
shoot contents of nutrientse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
Moste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Austroboletus occidentalis
Austroboletus occidentalis · InteractorGerhard Koller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1485 · show in text ↑
e2

“Most inoculated crop and pasture species also exhibited increased shoot contents of nutrients, including P, nitrogen, potassium, and several micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1093 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant-available P in soil was significantly higher in inoculated treatments than in non-inoculated controls across all plant species.

Taxon
crops and pasturese5
Treatment
inoculated treatmentse3
Interactor
Austroboletus occidentalisAustroboletus occidentalise5symbiont
Outcome
Plant-available P in soile3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
across all plant speciese3
Comparator
non-inoculated controlse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Austroboletus occidentalis
Austroboletus occidentalis · InteractorGerhard Koller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1485 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plant-available P in soil was significantly higher ( p < 0.05) in the inoculated treatments compared with the non-inoculated controls across all plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant utilization efficiency of P (PUpE) was enhanced in most inoculated species.

Taxon
crops and pasturese5
Treatment
inoculatede4
Interactor
Austroboletus occidentalisAustroboletus occidentalise5symbiont
Outcome
PUpEe4
Direction
enhancede4
Qualifier
moste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Austroboletus occidentalis
Austroboletus occidentalis · InteractorGerhard Koller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1485 · show in text ↑
e4

“PUpE was also enhanced in most inoculated species, with the highest gains in wheat (by 122%) and maize (by 65%) relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PUpE gain in wheat was 122% relative to the control under inoculation.

Treatment
inoculatede4
Interactor
Austroboletus occidentalisAustroboletus occidentalise5symbiont
Outcome
PUpEe4
Direction
highest gainse4
Value
122%e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Austroboletus occidentalis
Austroboletus occidentalis · InteractorGerhard Koller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1485 · show in text ↑
e4

“PUpE was also enhanced in most inoculated species, with the highest gains in wheat (by 122%) and maize (by 65%) relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PUpE gain in maize was 65% relative to the control under inoculation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
inoculatede4
Interactor
Austroboletus occidentalisAustroboletus occidentalise5symbiont
Outcome
PUpEe4
Direction
highest gainse4
Value
65%e4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Austroboletus occidentalis
Austroboletus occidentalis · InteractorGerhard Koller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1485 · show in text ↑
e4

“PUpE was also enhanced in most inoculated species, with the highest gains in wheat (by 122%) and maize (by 65%) relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1390 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures.

Taxon
crops and pasturese5
Interactor
Austroboletus occidentalisAustroboletus occidentalise5symbiont
Outcome
effective symbiosise5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Austroboletus occidentalis
Austroboletus occidentalis · InteractorGerhard Koller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1485 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The feremycorrhizal symbiosis is a novel approach for sustainable P management in cropping and pasture systems.

Taxon
crops and pasturese5
Outcome
sustainable P managemente6

Verbatim

e5

“Austroboletus occidentalis formed effective symbiosis with a wide range of crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1485 · show in text ↑
e6

“By enhancing soil-available P, plant nutrient uptake and growth, the FM symbiosis presents a novel approach for sustainable P management in cropping and pasture systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1703 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Austroboletus occidentalis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.